TABLE 1.
Comparison of agar dilution and broth microdilution method MICs for the three participating laboratories interpreted at 24 and 48 ha
| Antimicrobial agent | Value at 24 h/value at 48 h
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficient (r) | Regression slope | |
| Amikacin | 0.92/0.92 | 0.98/0.95 |
| Gentamicin | 0.96/0.96 | 1.00/1.00 |
| Tobramycin | 0.94/0.93 | 1.02/1.00 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.86/0.86 | 0.86/0.87 |
| Piperacillin | 0.88/0.83 | 0.89/0.91 |
| Ticarcillin | 0.89/0.88 | 0.92/0.86 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 0.88/0.92 | 0.93/0.98 |
| Ticarcillin-clavulanate | 0.87/0.88 | 0.96/0.98 |
| Ceftazidime | 0.91/0.93 | 0.93/0.90 |
| Aztreonam | 0.88/0.87 | 0.87/0.86 |
| Imipenem | 0.88/0.85 | 0.85/0.76 |
| Meropenem | 0.88/0.87 | 0.87/0.87 |
n = 6,999 comparisons.