Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 21;37(5):338–348. doi: 10.1159/000514196

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Year Country Age, years Type Criteria FC, µg/g Method TP FP FN TN
Carlsen et al. [30] 2018 Multicenter 44 (29–52) Prospective MES 0 25 ELISA 10 6 15 64
Goll et al. [24] 2019 Norway NA Prospective MES 0 28 ELISA 16 11 26 51
Theede et al. [25] 2016 Denmark 39.3 (13.92) Prospective HS 0 45 ELISA 28 0 33 8
Sandborn et al. [28] 2016 Multicenter 39.9±15.1 Prospective MES 0 50 ELISA 29 77 4 84
Patel et al. [16] 2017 USA 26 (2–56) Retrospective PRO2 0 + MES 0 60 ELISA 12 2 2 52
Kristensen et al. [22] 2015 Norway 35.5 (18–72) Prospective MES 0 61 ELISA 37 3 7 15
Kim et al. [20] 2020 Korea 50 (18–81) Prospective MES 0 70 ELISA 58 18 7 44
Carlsen et al. [30] 2018 Multicenter 44 (29–52) Prospective MES 0 + Geboes 0/1 74 ELISA 11 26 1 51
Sandborn et al. [28] 2016 Multicenter 39.9±15.1 Prospective MES 0 75 ELISA 28 53 5 108
Kristensen et al. [22] 2015 Norway 35.5 (18–72) Prospective MES 0 96 ELISA 40 3 4 15
Kim et al. [20] 2020 Korea 50 (18–81) Prospective MES 0 100 ELISA 58 21 7 41
Sandborn et al. [28] 2016 Multicenter 39.9±15.1 Prospective MES 0 100 ELISA 27 53 6 108
Goll et al. [24] 2019 Norway NA Prospective MES 0 100 ELISA 36 25 6 37
Lee et al. [19] 2019 Korea 48.4±13.2 (23–80) Prospective MES 0 150 QPOCT 6 0 1 22
Carlsen et al. [30] 2018 Multicenter 44 (29–52) Prospective MES 0 + Geboes 0/1 150 ELISA 11 36 1 41
Sandborn et al. [28] 2016 Multicenter 39.9±15.1 Prospective MES 0 150 ELISA 26 41 7 120
Ryu et al. [17] 2019 Korea 47.2 (16–78) Retrospective MES 0 170 ELISA 40 31 11 92
Hiraoka et al. [11] 2018 Japan 32 (22–43) Prospective MES 0 180 ELISA 84 24 38 75
Theede et al. [15] 2015 Denmark 19–79 Retrospective MES 0 192 ELISA 24 10 8 78
Yamaguchi et al. [29] 2016 Multicenter 45 (36–54) Prospective MES 0 194 ELISA 37 22 15 31
Takashima et al. [8] 2015 Japan 35.5 (14–77) Prospective MES 0 200 ELISA 34 17 10 44
Sandborn et al. [28] 2016 Multicenter 39.9±15.1 Prospective MES 0 200 ELISA 23 29 10 132
Mak et al. [26] 2018 USA 36.0±18.7 Prospective MES 0 200 ELISA 4 11 1 45
Lee et al. [19] 2019 Korea 48.4±13.2 (23–80) Prospective MES 0 201 ELISA 5 0 2 22
Ryu et al. [17] 2019 Korea 47.2 (16–78) Retrospective UCEIS 0/1 170 ELISA 44 27 15 98
Sandborn et al. [28] 2016 Multicenter 39.9±15.1 Prospective MES 0–1 200 ELISA 26 69 7 92
Yamaguchi et al. [29] 2016 Multicenter 45 (36–54) Prospective MES 0–1 200 ELISA 63 1 31 10
Mak et al. [26] 2018 USA 36.0±18.7 Prospective HS 200 ELISA 5 13 2 41
Takashima et al. [8] 2015 Japan 35.5 (14–77) Prospective MES 0–1 250 ELISA 45 14 19 27
Kristensen et al. [23] 2017 Norway 31 (18–60) Prospective MES 0–1 250 ELISA 16 0 3 1
Sandborn et al. [28] 2016 Multicenter 39.9±15.1 Prospective MES 0–1 250 ELISA 25 68 8 93
D'Haens et al. [21] 2012 Belgium 38 (30–46) Prospective MES 0/1 250 ELISA 14 3 4 18
Mak et al. [26] 2018 USA 36.0±18.7 Prospective MES 0–1 250 ELISA 3 13 2 43
Kristensen et al. [22] 2015 Norway 35.5 (18–72) Prospective MES 0–1 259 ELISA 25 9 5 23
Arai et al. [18] 2017 Japan 31.8 (15–69) Prospective SES-CD 0 180 ELISA 4 1 6 13
Inokuchi et al. [9] 2016 Japan 32 (22–43) Prospective SES-CD 0 180 ELISA 20 14 3 34
Ma et al. [10] 2017 Canada 47.9 (22–75) Prospective SES-CD 0 215 ELISA 36 12 7 31
Zubin and Peter [27] 2015 Australia 13.5 (12.2–13.88) Prospective SES-CD 0 250 ELISA 11 4 15 10

QPOCT, quantitative point-of-care test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PRO2, patient-reported outcome measures; HS, histologic inflammatory activity score.