Table 1.

Measures used in survey

Measure	Objective	Responses	No. Items	Range/category	Cronbach’s α
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory – Short Form (MFSI-SF)  General  Physical  Vigor  Emotional  Mental  Total†	Patient-reported outcome of acute fatigue	Likert Scale; 0 (not at all) – 4 (extremely)	30	24 – 96	0.84–0.93 (Donovan et al., 2015)
Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER)  Acute Fatigue  Chronic Fatigue  Intershift Recovery	Evaluation of work-related fatigue	Likert Scale; 0 (strongly disagree) – 6 (strongly agree)	15	0–90	0.75–0.93 (Winwood, Winefield, Dawson, & Lushington, 2005)
Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE)‡  Maladaptive Coping  Adaptive Coping	Evaluation of various coping strategies to demands and stress	Likert Scale; 1 (I usually don’t do this at all) – 4 (I do this a lot)	27	7–28	0.50–0.90 (Carver, 1997)
PROMIS®  Global Physical Health	Patient-reported overall general evaluations of physical health	Likert Scale; 1 (Excellent; Completely) – 5 (Poor; Not at All)	2	2–10	0.81 (Cella et al., 2010)
PROMIS®  Sleep Disturbance	Patient-reported evaluation of sleep quality	Likert Scale; 1 (not at all) – 5 (very much)	4	4–20	0.84 (Cella et al., 2010)
Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ)  Decision Latitude  Psychological Demands  Physical Demand  Coworker Support  Supervisor Support	Evaluation of job strain and workplace social support and	Likert Scale; 1 (totally disagree) – 4 (totally agree)	49	49–196	0.58–0.86 (Karasek et a., 1998)

^†Total calculated by sum of all subscales subtracted by Vigor

^‡For the Brief Cope (Furman et al., 2018), Adaptive Coping includes the subscales: Acceptance, Active Coping, Emotional Support, Instrumental Support, Planning, Positive Reframing, and Religion. Maladaptive Coping includes the subscales: Behavioral Disengagement, Denial, Humor, Self-Distraction, Venting, Self-Blame, and Substance Use.