Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Comparison 3. Biomedical feedback (patient‐level).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Long‐term abstinence (subgrouped by type) 7 3491 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.81, 1.41]
3.1.1 Spirometry 4 2137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.72, 1.86]
3.1.2 CO monitoring 1 1040 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.15 [0.87, 1.51]
3.1.3 Gene testing for lung cancer risk 1 109 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.40, 1.80]
3.1.4 CO monitoring & spirometry 1 205 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.64 [0.29, 1.40]