Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Carpenter 2020.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: Cluster‐randomized trial
Setting: 22 primary care clinics in South Carolina, USA
Recruitment: patients identified at routine visits
Participants 1245 adults who smoked, 61% female, average age 50.7, average cpd 15
Interventions Intervention: cessation advice and brochure with information on quitline, plus a 2‐week supply of both nicotine patch and lozenge, with minimal instructions on use
Control: cessation advice and brochure with information on quitline
Training given to providers was based on study procedures and standard care
Outcomes 7‐day PPA at 6m
Validation: none
Quit attempts
Funding Source National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA 021619), with additional research support through NIH UL1
TR001450 and K23 DA 045766
Author's declarations of interest Some authors have received consulting honoraria from Pfizer (does not produce NRT)
Notes Strategy: Cost‐free medication
Level: Patient
Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Low risk Stratified randomization lists created at the outset of the study
Allocation concealment Low risk Accessible only to the study statistician
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Smoking status was not validated, but both groups had minimal contact, with no difference in the face‐to‐face contact between the arms
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes Low risk At patient level, the number of participants lost was 41.1% (512/1245); 40.3% (263/652) in the standard care group and 42.0% (249/593) in the intervention group, no significant differences between groups, intention‐to‐ treat used to analyze data
Recruitment bias (cluster RCTs only) Low risk 22/24 clinics approached agreed to participants. Patient participants were affiliated with the practice before randomization. 6 eligible patients did not enrol
Balanced baseline characteristics? (cluster RCTs only) High risk Quote: "several baseline variables differed significantly between groups…" and adjusted for in the analysis
Adjustment for clustering in analysis? (cluster RCTs only) Low risk adjustment for clustering was conducted