Cobos‐Campos 2016.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: 2 health centres in the Basque Health Service, Spain Recruitment: Identified through EMR and sent invitation letter |
|
Participants | 320 adults who smoked, 44% female, average age 45 | |
Interventions | Intervention: participants received health advice from a doctor or nurse, as in the other group, plus reinforcement text messages to their mobile phones Control: participants received health advice provided by a doctor or a nurse |
|
Outcomes | Continuous abstinence at 12m Validation: Expired CO < 7 ppm |
|
Funding Source | This study was funded by the Departamento de Industria del Gobierno Vasco of the Basque Country under the 2012 Saiotek funding round (reference number SAIO12‐OA12BF001). This research was also supported by Departamento de Educación, Política Lingüística y Cultura del Gobierno Vasco (IT620‐13) | |
Author's declarations of interest | Authors declared that they had no conflict of interest | |
Notes | Strategy: SMS messages Level: Patient Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation | Low risk | Computer‐generated sequence |
Allocation concealment | Low risk | QUOTE: "the Bioaraba Research Institute assigned patients to one of the two arms of the trial...after receiving the patient randomization form, and hence research nurse did not know about the treatment group until patient allocation" |
Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | Low risk | Smoking status was validated by carbon monoxide |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | High risk | The overall loss to follow‐up was 87.5% (n = 280/320); 80.6% (n = 129/160) in the text messaging+health advice group and 94.4% (n = 151/160) in the health advice‐only group were lost to follow‐up at 12 months |