Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Hollis 1993.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: Randomized controlled trial with 4 active trial arms
Setting: 2 large primary care clinics, USA
Recruitment: Recruited in practice by receptionists
Participants 2707 adults who smoked, av. age 40, 57% F, 18 cpd
Interventions Intervention 1: participants received physician advice, carbon monoxide assessment, a quit‐smoking video, a quit kit (gum, toothpicks and cinnamon sticks), self‐help materials, mailed newsletters and a follow‐up call at 2 ‐ 4 weeks from a counselor. They were encouraged to set a quit date
Intervention 2: participants received physician advice, carbon monoxide assessment, a video encouraging them to attend a smoking cessation support group, self‐help materials, coupon for quit‐smoking group, postcards reminding them of group meeting times
Intervention 3: participants received the support offered to the control group and intervention 2 group combined
Control: participants received a 30‐second advice message and a pamphlet
Outcomes 7d PPA at 3m and 12m
Validation: Salivary cotinine
Funding Source Public Health Service Grant 1P01‐CA44648 from the National Cancer Institute.
Author's declarations of interest Not reported.
Notes Strategy: Adjunctive counseling + CO monitoring
Level: Patient
Comparison type: Multicomponent vs. standard care
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation High risk QUOTE: "two random digits contained in the patient's health record number were used to assign patients..."
Allocation concealment High risk QUOTE: "two random digits contained in the patient's health record number were used to assign patients..."
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Smoking abstinence was biochemically validated
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes Unclear risk Response rates did not differ between groups. Rates not reported.