Hollis 1993.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: Randomized controlled trial with 4 active trial arms Setting: 2 large primary care clinics, USA Recruitment: Recruited in practice by receptionists |
|
Participants | 2707 adults who smoked, av. age 40, 57% F, 18 cpd | |
Interventions |
Intervention 1: participants received physician advice, carbon monoxide assessment, a quit‐smoking video, a quit kit (gum, toothpicks and cinnamon sticks), self‐help materials, mailed newsletters and a follow‐up call at 2 ‐ 4 weeks from a counselor. They were encouraged to set a quit date Intervention 2: participants received physician advice, carbon monoxide assessment, a video encouraging them to attend a smoking cessation support group, self‐help materials, coupon for quit‐smoking group, postcards reminding them of group meeting times Intervention 3: participants received the support offered to the control group and intervention 2 group combined Control: participants received a 30‐second advice message and a pamphlet |
|
Outcomes | 7d PPA at 3m and 12m Validation: Salivary cotinine |
|
Funding Source | Public Health Service Grant 1P01‐CA44648 from the National Cancer Institute. | |
Author's declarations of interest | Not reported. | |
Notes | Strategy: Adjunctive counseling + CO monitoring Level: Patient Comparison type: Multicomponent vs. standard care |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation | High risk | QUOTE: "two random digits contained in the patient's health record number were used to assign patients..." |
Allocation concealment | High risk | QUOTE: "two random digits contained in the patient's health record number were used to assign patients..." |
Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | Low risk | Smoking abstinence was biochemically validated |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Unclear risk | Response rates did not differ between groups. Rates not reported. |