Hoving 2010.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: Dutch pharmacies and primary care clinics, The Netherlands Recruitment: Passively recruited through baseline questionnaires in waiting rooms |
|
Participants | 474 adults who smoked (from GP sample) motivated to quit smoking within 6 months. 59% F, av.age 42, av. cpd 22 | |
Interventions | Intervention: participants received a tailored letter based on responses to a questionnaire. Messages addressed perceived advantages and disadvantages of smoking cessation and anticipated difficult situations to refrain from smoking. Additionally, the tailored letter was personalized by including individual information. All personally relevant messages were then combined into a 5 ‐ 7 page letter Control: participants received a thank‐you letter after completing a questionnaire |
|
Outcomes | Continuous abstinence at 6m Validation: None Quit attempts |
|
Funding Source | Not reported | |
Author's declarations of interest | Not reported. | |
Notes | Strategy: Tailored print material Level: Patient Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation | High risk | QUOTE: "Smokers were randomised based on the colour coding on their questionnaire..." |
Allocation concealment | High risk | QUOTE: "Smokers were randomised based on the colour coding on their questionnaire..." |
Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | Low risk | Smoking status was self‐report, but contact was low, reducing potential risk of bias |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details on the number of participants lost to follow‐up in the control group reported |