Hughes 1991.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: Randomized controlled trial with 3 active trial arms Setting: 2 rural family practices, USA Recruitment: Conducted in practice waiting room |
|
Participants | 106 adults who smoked who had never used NRT gum, did not need to be motivated to quit, 62% M, av.age 37, 26 cpd | |
Interventions |
Intervention 1: participants received 10 minutes of brief advice from physician, instruction to use free nicotine gum and a stop‐smoking booklet Intervention 2: participants received 10 minutes of brief advice from physician, instruction to use cost‐reduced NRT gum (USD 6/box) and a stop‐smoking booklet. Intervention 3: participants received 10 minutes of brief advice from physician, instruction to use nicotine gum (to purchase at a full price of USD 20/box) and a stop‐smoking booklet |
|
Outcomes | Sustained abstinence at 12m Validation: No biochemical validation. Observers were used to verify cessation Quit attempts |
|
Funding Source | Grant (DA‐04066) and Research Scientist Development Award (DA‐00109) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Merreil‐Dow Research Institute provided nicotine gum | |
Author's declarations of interest | Not reported | |
Notes | Strategy: Cost‐free medications Level: Patient Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation | Unclear risk | No details reported |
Allocation concealment | Low risk | QUOTE: "After the advice had been given, the physician opened a sealed envelope and signed a prescription that indicated the price group to which the smoker had been assigned" |
Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | Low risk | Observers were used to verify cessation and contact matched between trial arms |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details reported |