Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Marley 2014.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: Randomized controlled trial
Setting: 2 Aboriginal Controlled Community Health Services, Australia
Recruitment: Passive recruitment through visits to primary care clinics and active recruitment by researchers through community and family links
Participants 163 Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders, ≥ 16 years of age, reporting current smoking or quitting within 2 weeks of recruitment, thinking about cutting down or quitting smoking, regular client of 1 of 2 Aboriginal Health Services. av. age 39, 54% F, av. cpd 15
Interventions Intervention: in addition to usual care, participants received in‐person smoking cessation counseling scheduled weekly for the first 4 weeks, monthly to 6 months and 2‐monthly to 12 months (12 sessions). Delivered by Aboriginal researchers
Control: participants received usual care ‐ smoking cessation support at their local primary health care service, including advice regarding quitting, pharmacotherapy, and self‐initiated follow‐up
Outcomes 7‐day PPA at 12m
Validation: Urinary cotinine < 50 ng/mL
Funding Source National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC, project grant number 513818)
Author's declarations of interest Authors declared that they had no competing interest.
Notes Strategy: Adjunctive counseling
Level: Patient
Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Low risk QUOTE: "A computer generated random allocation sequence was used"
Allocation concealment Low risk QUOTE: "Sealed envelopes containing the allocation were kept at the centralised coordinating site. Allocation occurred via telephone with envelopes being opened in sequential order"
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Smoking status biochemically validated
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes Low risk The overall loss to follow‐up was 14.3% (n = 24/168); 15.5% (n = 9/58) in the intervention group and 13.6% (n = 15/110) in the control group were lost to follow‐up at 12 months