Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Nebot 1992.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: cluster‐randomized controlled trial
Setting: 3 urban reformed primary care centres in Barcelona, Spain
Recruitment: All people who smoked (> 1 cpd) visiting physician for any reason
Participants 15 primary care teams within 3 primary care centres
425 adults who smoked, 30% F, av. age not reported, av. cpd not reported
Interventions Intervention 1: physician counseling
Participants received standard physician advice operatively defined as a personalized firm counsel to stop smoking, lasting 3 ‐ 5 minutes
Intervention 2: physician counseling + nicotine gum
Participants received standard physician advice plus a free supply of nicotine gum sufficient to last 2 ‐ 4 weeks
Intervention 3: nurse counseling
Participants received up to 15 minutes of nurse advice
Outcomes Abstinence (undefined) at 12m follow‐up
Validation: Expired CO < 8 ppm
Funding Source Grant from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social
Author's declarations of interest Not reported
Notes Strategy: Cost‐free medication + Adjunctive counseling
Level: Patient
Comparison types: Single component vs. standard care (testing cost‐free medications and adjunct counseling individually in separate trial arms)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Unclear risk No details reported
Allocation concealment Unclear risk No details reported
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Smoking status validated by carbon monoxide levels
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes Unclear risk Authors reported that 82% were followed up at 2 months, but they did not report the follow‐up rate at 12 months
Recruitment bias (cluster RCTs only) Low risk Participants were affiliated with the practice before randomization
Balanced baseline characteristics? (cluster RCTs only) Low risk QUOTE: "The three groups had no significant differences in these characteristics except for the proportion of smokers having tried to quit before (higher among the B group patients)"
Adjustment for clustering in analysis? (cluster RCTs only) High risk None apparent