Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Olano Espinosa 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: Cluster‐ randomized controlled trial
Setting: Healthcare centres in Area 11 of the Spanish Madrid Health System, Spain
Recruitment: Participants selected from computerized clinic records
Participants 405 nurses and 425 doctors from the 35 clinics
5910 adults who smoked. av.age 43, 53% F, av. cpd not reported
Interventions Intervention: professionals received 4 x 90‐minute training sessions on smoking cessation
Control: professionals were offered the training after finishing the follow‐up period
Outcomes Continuous abstinence at 6m
Validation: Salivary cotinine < 13 ng/ml
Funding Source Spanish Public Health Investigations Fund, with no role in the study
Author's declarations of interest QUOTE: "Two authors (FJA and EOE) work as directors of Cantabria University Tobacco Control Master"
Notes Strategy: Provider training
Level: Provider
Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Low risk QUOTE: "...randomly selected 15 patients for each quota by using number combinations generated with EPIDAT 2.0 software"
Allocation concealment Low risk QUOTE: "An independent research assistant assigned the 35 health care centers randomly using SPSS v.12 software...". No further detail provided.
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Abstinence biochemically validated
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Recruitment bias (cluster RCTs only) Low risk Participants were affiliated with the practice before randomization
Balanced baseline characteristics? (cluster RCTs only) Low risk QUOTE: "No significant differences were found between both groups with respect to profession, age, sex, professional experience, percentage of smokers, and previous training in treating tobacco addiction"
Adjustment for clustering in analysis? (cluster RCTs only) High risk Not apparent