Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Ramos 2010.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: 3‐group randomized controlled trial
Setting; A primary healthcare setting in Mallorca, Spain
Recruitment: Patients who met inclusion criteria were invited to participate
Participants 287 adults who smoked, who are preparing to quit. (81 in individual intervention, 111 in group intervention, 95 control), av. age 44, av. cpd 20
Interventions Intervention 1: As control (below), plus individual counseling on pharmacological treatment
• Participants attended 6 visits during which the following were provided: counseling, pharmacotherapy, psychological support and standard follow‐up
• Physicians and nurses received training on how to implement intensive interventions
Intervention 2: As control below, plus group counseling on pharmacological treatment
• Participants attended 6 visits during which the following were provided: counseling, pharmacotherapy, psychological support and standard follow‐up
• Physicians and nurses received training on how to implement intensive interventions
Control:
• Participants received pharmacotherapy (nicotine derivatives or bupropion)
• Physician and nurse received basic training on how to diagnose smoking addiction and provide brief counseling
• Support provided by microteam, composed of 1 physician and 1 nurse
Outcomes Continuous abstinence at 12m
Validation: Expired CO < 6 ppm
Funding Source Health Research Fund of Spain's Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs, Health Promotion and Preventive Activities in Primary Health Care Research Network
Author's declarations of interest Authors declared that they had no competing interest
Notes Strategy: Adjunctive counseling + Provider training
Level: Patient + Provider
Comparison type: Multicomponent vs. standard care
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Unclear risk No details reported.
Allocation concealment Low risk QUOTE: "an allocation concealment method based on the use of sequentially‐numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes was used"
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Smoking status biochemically validated.
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes High risk Follow‐up at 12 months was very low and completed in 31% of cases in intervention 1 (individual), 28% in the intervention 2 (group) and 24% in the control group (minimal intervention).