Roski 2003.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: 3‐group cluster‐randomized controlled trial Setting: 40 clinics of a large multispecialty medical group practice providing primary care services, USA Recruitment: Exit interviews with patients in the clinic |
|
Participants | 4813 patients (873 people who smoked) at baseline survey. 4734 patients (863 people who smoked) at follow‐up. Patients were 18 years or older who had visited their provider in the past 30 days, av.age not reported, av. cpd not reported | |
Interventions | Common component in all groups: printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines distributed to the practices. Intervention 1: practices received printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines, financial incentives for reaching preset clinical performance targets Intervention 2: practices received printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines, financial incentives for reaching preset clinical performance targets combined with access to a centralized registry of people who smoked and intervention system which delivered telephone counseling Control: distribution of printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines only |
|
Outcomes | 7‐day PPA at 6m Validation: None Measures of provider implementation: Ask, Advise, Assist |
|
Funding Source | Supported in part by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant 036023) | |
Author's declarations of interest | Not reported | |
Notes | Strategy: Adjunctive counseling + Provider incentive Level: Patient + Practice + System Comparison type: Single component (provider incentives vs. standard care), active vs. active (isolating adjunctive counseling) & multicomponent vs. SC (provider incentives & adjunctive counseling) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation | Unclear risk | Randomly allocated by block randomization. No further details reported |
Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | No details reported |
Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | High risk | Smoking status self‐report. Contact between arms was different |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details reported |
Recruitment bias (cluster RCTs only) | Low risk | Participants were affiliated with the practice before randomization |
Balanced baseline characteristics? (cluster RCTs only) | Low risk | QUOTE: "At baseline no differences were found between the experimental conditions with respect to identification of tobacco use, provision of advice to quit, and assistance in quitting at the most recent clinic visit" |
Adjustment for clustering in analysis? (cluster RCTs only) | Low risk | QUOTE: "Analyses of practice pattern changes (identification, offer of advice to quit) and patient outcomes (quitting) made use of clustered logistic regression" |