Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Roski 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: 3‐group cluster‐randomized controlled trial
Setting: 40 clinics of a large multispecialty medical group practice providing primary care services, USA
Recruitment: Exit interviews with patients in the clinic
Participants 4813 patients (873 people who smoked) at baseline survey. 4734 patients (863 people who smoked) at follow‐up. Patients were 18 years or older who had visited their provider in the past 30 days, av.age not reported, av. cpd not reported
Interventions Common component in all groups: printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines distributed to the practices.
Intervention 1: practices received printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines, financial incentives for reaching preset clinical performance targets
Intervention 2: practices received printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines, financial incentives for reaching preset clinical performance targets combined with access to a centralized registry of people who smoked and intervention system which delivered telephone counseling
Control: distribution of printed versions of the smoking cessation guidelines only
Outcomes 7‐day PPA at 6m
Validation: None
Measures of provider implementation: Ask, Advise, Assist
Funding Source Supported in part by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant 036023)
Author's declarations of interest Not reported
Notes Strategy: Adjunctive counseling + Provider incentive
Level: Patient + Practice + System
Comparison type: Single component (provider incentives vs. standard care), active vs. active (isolating adjunctive counseling) & multicomponent vs. SC (provider incentives & adjunctive counseling)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Unclear risk Randomly allocated by block randomization. No further details reported
Allocation concealment Unclear risk No details reported
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes High risk Smoking status self‐report. Contact between arms was different
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes Unclear risk No details reported
Recruitment bias (cluster RCTs only) Low risk Participants were affiliated with the practice before randomization
Balanced baseline characteristics? (cluster RCTs only) Low risk QUOTE: "At baseline no differences were found between the experimental conditions with respect to identification of tobacco use, provision of advice to quit, and assistance in quitting at the most recent clinic visit"
Adjustment for clustering in analysis? (cluster RCTs only) Low risk QUOTE: "Analyses of practice pattern changes (identification, offer of advice to quit) and patient outcomes (quitting) made use of clustered logistic regression"