Russell 1983.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: 3‐group randomized controlled trial Setting: 6 group practices in London and Kent, UK Recruitment: Completed in practice |
|
Participants | 2106 adults who smoked aged 16 years or more; 57% F; mean age 40.5 years; 17.5 cigarettes per day on average | |
Interventions |
Intervention 1: participants were advised to quit smoking and given a booklet Intervention 2: participants were advised to quit smoking, given a booklet and a prescription for free NRT gum Control: no intervention, no advice. No further details reported |
|
Outcomes | Abstinence (undefined) at 12m Validation: Expired CO < 8 ppm Quit attempts |
|
Funding Source | Financial support was provided by the Medical Research Council and the AB Leo Research Foundation, Sweden | |
Author's declarations of interest | Not reported | |
Notes | Strategy: Cost‐free medications Level: Patient Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation | High risk | Participants were assigned to groups according to their week of attendance |
Allocation concealment | High risk | Not concealed |
Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | High risk | Smoking status was self‐reported. Authors state that the control group had no advice, which implies that face‐to‐face contact was greater in the intervention groups |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Low risk | The overall loss to follow‐up was 8.0% (n = 168/2106); 8.8% (n = 65/740) in the 'advice+booklet' group, 6.9% (n = 50/729) in the 'advice+booklet+prescription' group and 8.3% (n = 53/637) in the control group were lost to follow‐up at 12 months |