Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Sanz‐Pozo 2006.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: Randomized controlled trial
Setting: Primary care clinic, Spain
Recruitment: GPs recruited patients in practice
Participants 125 people who smoked daily, attending clinic, motivated to make a quit attempt but not interested in using pharmacotherapy, av.age ~ 40, av.cpd 19, 52% F (intervention), 62% F (control)
Interventions Intervention: participants received brief advice from their doctor at recruitment, an appointment with clinic nurse 7 days before TQD, on TQD, 1w, 1m, 2m, 3m.
Control: participants received brief advice only
Outcomes 12m sustained abstinence at 24m
Validation: Expired CO < 8 ppm
Funding Source Not reported
Author's declarations of interest Not reported
Notes Strategy: Adjunctive counseling
Level: Patient
Comparison type: Single component
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Unclear risk QUOTE: "the patients recruited were randomised, according to the clinic from which they came, to the group that received...". No further detail.
Allocation concealment Unclear risk No details reported
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Smoking abstinence was biochemically validated
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes High risk The overall loss to follow‐up was 42.4% (n = 53/125); 75% (n = 45/60) in the intervention group and 12.3% (n = 8/65) in the control group were lost to follow‐up at 2 years