Sanz‐Pozo 2006.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: Randomized controlled trial
Setting: Primary care clinic, Spain Recruitment: GPs recruited patients in practice |
|
Participants | 125 people who smoked daily, attending clinic, motivated to make a quit attempt but not interested in using pharmacotherapy, av.age ~ 40, av.cpd 19, 52% F (intervention), 62% F (control) | |
Interventions | Intervention: participants received brief advice from their doctor at recruitment, an appointment with clinic nurse 7 days before TQD, on TQD, 1w, 1m, 2m, 3m. Control: participants received brief advice only | |
Outcomes | 12m sustained abstinence at 24m Validation: Expired CO < 8 ppm | |
Funding Source | Not reported | |
Author's declarations of interest | Not reported | |
Notes | Strategy: Adjunctive counseling Level: Patient Comparison type: Single component |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation | Unclear risk | QUOTE: "the patients recruited were randomised, according to the clinic from which they came, to the group that received...". No further detail. |
Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | No details reported |
Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | Low risk | Smoking abstinence was biochemically validated |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | High risk | The overall loss to follow‐up was 42.4% (n = 53/125); 75% (n = 45/60) in the intervention group and 12.3% (n = 8/65) in the control group were lost to follow‐up at 2 years |