Secades Villa 2009.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Design: 3‐group cluster‐randomized controlled trial Setting: 3 primary care centers in Asturias, Spain Recruitment: Opportunistic recruitment of people who smoked attending the practice |
|
| Participants | 89 adults who smoked (> 10 cpd) ready to quit. 61% F, 22 cpd, av.age 43 | |
| Interventions |
Intervention 1: participants received a 7‐minute brief counseling in which they set a quit date, self‐help materials and 4 follow‐up telephone calls from a general practitioner or a primary care nurse Intervention 2: participants received 1 x 20‐min counseling session weekly for 5 weeks, delivered by a clinical psychologist Control: participants received a 7‐minute brief counseling and self‐help materials |
|
| Outcomes | Continuous abstinence at 12m Validation: Expired CO ≤ 4 ppm |
|
| Funding Source | Supported by research grant no. MB‐02‐506‐2 from the University of Oviedo (Spain) | |
| Author's declarations of interest | Not reported | |
| Notes | Strategy: Adjunctive counseling Level: Patient Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Sequence Generation | Unclear risk | No details reported |
| Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | No details reported |
| Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | Low risk | Smoking status biochemically validated |
| Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Low risk | At 6‐month follow‐up, 100% of participants were located |
| Recruitment bias (cluster RCTs only) | Low risk | Participants were affiliated with the practice before randomization |
| Balanced baseline characteristics? (cluster RCTs only) | High risk | There were statistically significant differences among the groups (P < .05) on 2 characteristics: age and years smoking |
| Adjustment for clustering in analysis? (cluster RCTs only) | Unclear risk | No details reported |