Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;2021(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2

Van Rossem 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: Randomized controlled trial
Setting: Primary healthcare center in The Netherlands
Recruitment: Participants were recruited by practice assistants, general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) and via a brief and easily written leaflet displayed in the waiting room
Participants 295 participants, 19 cpd, av.age 48, 53% F
Interventions PN Group: Participants were offered 3 face‐to‐face and 7 telephone sessions, starting 1 week prior to the quit attempt until 1 year after the quit attempt. Participants also received a prescription for varenicline
GP Group: Participants received a minimum of 1 visit in which they received a prescription for varenicline. Participants were free to contact their GP in case of questions or side‐effects
Outcomes Prolonged abstinence from 9w to 26w
Validation: Expired CO < 10 ppm
Funding Source This was an investigator‐initiated trial, funded by a collaboration of Eindhoven Corporation of Primary Health Care Centres (SGE), Pfizer (grant number GPIHP_RG_2010014T1330) and Research School CAPHRI
Author's declarations of interest QUOTE: "D.K. received an unrestricted grant from Pfizer Inc. and The Eindhoven Corporation of Primary Health Care Centers for this investigator‐initiated smoking cessation trial. C.S. received funding for research proposals from GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer. A.L. was a general practitioner at The Eindhoven Corporation of Primary Health Care Centers during the research. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation to this paper"
Notes Strategy: Adjunctive counseling
Level: Patient
Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sequence Generation Low risk Computer‐generated random‐number sequence
Allocation concealment Low risk Computer‐generated random‐number sequence, allocation disclosed by phone
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes Low risk Smoking status biochemically validated
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes Low risk The overall loss to follow‐up was 18.0% (n = 53/295); 14.8% (n = 22/149) in the PN group and 20.0% (n = 31/146) in the GP group were lost to follow‐up at 6 months