Vetter 1990.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: A health center in a small town in the countryside, UK Recruitment: Postal questionnaire to practice patients |
|
| Participants | 471 people who smoked aged 60 years and older, registered as a patient with the group practice; 48.0% F, av. age not reported, av. cpd not reported | |
| Interventions | Intervention: Participants received physician advice and additional smoking cessation counseling by a practice nurse Control: Participants received physician advice only |
|
| Outcomes | PPA at 6m Validation: Expired CO, cut‐off not reported |
|
| Funding Source | The Grand Charity | |
| Author's declarations of interest | Not reported | |
| Notes | Strategy: Adjunctive counseling Level: Patient Comparison type: Single component vs. standard care |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Sequence Generation | Unclear risk | No details reported |
| Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | No details reported |
| Blinding of outcome assessors All outcomes | Low risk | Abstinence was biochemically validated by carbon monoxide levels |
| Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Unclear risk | QUOTE: "approximately 10% of subjects failed to respond to the second questionnaire". No further details were reported. |