Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;2021(7):CD013656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013656.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Albala 2000 Ineligible intervention (Variant technique: periurethral); cross‐over at 3 months with no interpretable outcome data.
Arai 2000 Prospective observational study comparing TUMT with other modalities.
Bagla 2017 Irrelevant study design (retrospective chart review for cost analysis).
Bilhim 2015 Letter to editor.
Brown 2018 Irrelevant study design (retrospective comparative study).
D'Ancona 1997 Observational non‐comparative study.
Dahlstrand 2003 Review article (full‐text assessment).
Djavan 1999 Ineligible comparison: TUMT ± neoadjuvant alpha‐blocker.
Gratzke 2018 Wrong study design: single arm study for prostatic urethral lift.
Hahn 2000 Observational study on cardiovascular complications of TUMT.
Hansen 1998 Methods paper on the symptoms scores. The TUMT data come from an observational study.
ISRCTN23921450 “Please note that this trial was terminated due to poor recruitment.”
Kobelt 2004 Economic data only from the Wagrell 2002 trial.
Lim 2011 Case series of a temporary nitinol device.
Mulvin 1994 Non‐randomized comparative study of TUMT and transurethral catheter therapy.
NCT01835860 Irrelevant study design (single group assignment).
Norby 2002b Economic data only of the Nørby 2002a study.
Nørby 2004 Review article (full‐text assessment).
Ohigashi 2007 Prospective observational study comparing TUMT with other modalities.
Pereira 2018 Irrelevant study design (retrospective comparative study).
Porpiglia 2015 Single‐arm study of the first‐generation TIND device.
Porpiglia 2019 Single‐arm study of the second‐generation TIND device.
Qiu 2017 Irrelevant study design (retrospective comparative study).
Russo 2015 Irrelevant comparator (open simple prostatectomy).
Schelin 2006 Ineligible comparison: Compares TUMT to a group of participants that underwent TURP and enucleation surgery (no disaggregated data available).
Servadio 1987 Observational study of the use of TUMT for various diseases of the prostate.
Shore 2010 Ineligible comparison: Compared 2 similar energy TUMT systems that differed only by an adjunct balloon dilator.
Tan 2005 Long‐term follow‐up of the sham crossed‐over group. Ten out of 12 participants in the sham group had crossed over to the active treatment group and no disaggregated data were available for this group before crossing over.
Trock 2004 Pooled observational with previously extracted RCT data.
Vesely 2006 Non‐randomized comparative study: participants were assigned by severity to TUMT or TURP.
Waldén 1998 Economic data only on the Dahlstrand 1995 study.
Woo 2018 Wrong study design (educational lecture).
Yachia 1996 Non‐randomized comparison of two types of prostatic stents.
Zerbib 1992 Ineligible intervention: Transrectal hyperthermia.
Zerbib 1994 Ineligible intervention: Transrectal hyperthermia.