Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021 Sep 30;40(10):2880–2896. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3042789

TABLE II.

The p-values of two-sample t-tests (a significance level of 0.05) comparing S+TSTUDA to other methods, in terms of F1 score. S and T denote the source and target domains, respectively. The first, second, third and forth panels represent our method’s variants, proposed UDA methods, proposed SSDA methods with 5% gold-standard annotations available in each target dataset, and the target-only models respectively, for different radii (i.e., r = 16 and 8) used to define gold-standard regions.

Method r = 16 r = 8

H&E (T) DAPI (T) IHC (T) H&E (T) DAPI (T) IHC (T)

DAPI (S) IHC (S) H&E (S) IHC (S) H&E (S) DAPI (S) DAPI (S) IHC (S) H&E (S) IHC (S) H&E (S) DAPI (S)

1 Baseline 2×10−6 0.081 0.095 0.198 1.9×10−3 1.2×10−5 10−6 0.014 0.357 0.012 0.015 1.3×10−5
S 0.018 5.9×10−3 0.0 10−6 0.0 8.8×10−3 1.3×10−3 10−6 0.0 3×10−6 0.0 1.1×10−3
TST 1.8×10−3 10−6 0.114 0.442 5×10−6 1.5×10−3 4.3×10−5 3×10−6 1.8×10−3 0.05 2×10−6 1.9×10−4
TST 1.5×10−3 0.0 5×10−6 0.442 0.0 2.3×10−3 9.2×10−3 0.0 0.0 4×10−6 0.0 0.011

2 TSTUDA 0.546 3.1×10−3 0.077 0.703 0.598 0.572 0.248 0.035 0.018 0.327 0.856 0.319
S+TSTUDA - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 TSTSSDA 4.3×10−5 7.7×10−4 1.1×10−5 1.4×10−3 0.071 1.7×10−5 5.7×10−5 0.594 4×10−6 5.6×10−3 0.150 4.6×10−5
S+TSTSSDA 6×10−6 10−6 9×10−6 0.222 0.042 3×10−6 5×10−6 1.5×10−4 6×10−6 0.068 0.072 4×10−6

4 5%-target 2.4×10−3 0.847 1.5×10−5 0.012 0.576 2.1×10−5 2.1×10−3 0.059 5×10−6 0.036 0.672 4×10−6
Full-target 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2×10−4 2×10−6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3×10−5 10−6 0.0