Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 25.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Discov. 2021 Mar 11;11(8):1996–2013. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1546

Table 2.

Summary of responses (8 mg tilsotolimod + ipilimumab population)

Characteristic Primary efficacy analysisa (n = 21) Ipilimumab exposedb (n = 7) Ipilimumab naivec (n = 42) Totald (N = 49)
BOR, n (%)e
 CR 2 (9.5) 0 (0.0) 2 (4.8) 2 (4.1)
 PR 4 (19.0) 2 (28.6) 7 (16.7) 9 (18.4)
 SD 10 (47.6) 2 (28.6) 22 (52.4) 24 (49.0)
 PD 5 (23.8) 3 (42.9) 11 (26.2) 14 (28.6)
ORR, %f 28.6g 28.6 21.4 22.4
 95% CI, % 11.3-52.2 ND 10.3-36.8 11.8-36.6
DCR, %h 76.2 57.1 73.8 71.4
 95% CI, % 52.8-91.8 ND 58.0-86.1 56.7-83.4
Median DOR, mo ND ND 11.4 11.4
Interquartile range 10.2-NE 4.2-NE

Abbreviations: BOR, best overall response; CI, confidence interval; DOR, duration of response; ND, not determined; NE, not estimable; PD, progressive disease.

a

The primary efficacy analysis was ORR assessed in the first 21 patients who did not receive ipilimumab for metastatic disease enrolled at the RP2D of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab.

b

In the metastatic disease setting.

c

All patients who had not received ipilimumab for metastatic disease on study entry and treated at the RP2D of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab.

d

All patients treated at the RP2D of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab.

e

Assessed using RECIST v1.1.

f

(CR + PR)/number of patients × 100.

g

P = 0.02 versus ORR for historical control of 11% (20).

h

(CR + PR + SD)/number of patients × 100.