Table 2.
Summary of responses (8 mg tilsotolimod + ipilimumab population)
Characteristic | Primary efficacy analysisa (n = 21) | Ipilimumab exposedb (n = 7) | Ipilimumab naivec (n = 42) | Totald (N = 49) |
---|---|---|---|---|
BOR, n (%)e | ||||
CR | 2 (9.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (4.8) | 2 (4.1) |
PR | 4 (19.0) | 2 (28.6) | 7 (16.7) | 9 (18.4) |
SD | 10 (47.6) | 2 (28.6) | 22 (52.4) | 24 (49.0) |
PD | 5 (23.8) | 3 (42.9) | 11 (26.2) | 14 (28.6) |
ORR, %f | 28.6g | 28.6 | 21.4 | 22.4 |
95% CI, % | 11.3-52.2 | ND | 10.3-36.8 | 11.8-36.6 |
DCR, %h | 76.2 | 57.1 | 73.8 | 71.4 |
95% CI, % | 52.8-91.8 | ND | 58.0-86.1 | 56.7-83.4 |
Median DOR, mo | ND | ND | 11.4 | 11.4 |
Interquartile range | 10.2-NE | 4.2-NE |
Abbreviations: BOR, best overall response; CI, confidence interval; DOR, duration of response; ND, not determined; NE, not estimable; PD, progressive disease.
The primary efficacy analysis was ORR assessed in the first 21 patients who did not receive ipilimumab for metastatic disease enrolled at the RP2D of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab.
In the metastatic disease setting.
All patients who had not received ipilimumab for metastatic disease on study entry and treated at the RP2D of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab.
All patients treated at the RP2D of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab.
Assessed using RECIST v1.1.
(CR + PR)/number of patients × 100.
P = 0.02 versus ORR for historical control of 11% (20).
(CR + PR + SD)/number of patients × 100.