Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;14(6):6919–6946. doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03550-w

Table 3.

The ranking results with different used of p,q values

p,q Score value Ranking results
p=0,q=0 sh1=0.477,sh2=0.629,sh3=0.569,sh4=0.621 A4>A2>A3>A1
p=0.1,q=0 sh1=0.635,sh2=0.756,sh3=0.702,sh4=0.777 A4>A2>A3>A1
p=1,q=0 sh1=0.598,sh2=0.719,sh3=0.645,sh4=0.736 A4>A2>A3>A1
p=10,q=0 sh1=0.644,sh2=0.753,sh3=0.682,sh4=0.785 A4>A2>A3>A1
p=q=1 sh1=0.536,sh2=0.669,sh3=0.609,sh4=0.682 A4>A2>A3>A1
p=0.1,q=1 sh1=0.561,sh2=0.688,sh3=0.622,sh4=0.708 A4>A2>A3>A1
p=2,q=1 sh1=0.547,sh2=0.676,sh3=0.614,sh4=0.694 A4>A2>A3>A1
p=10,q=1 sh1=0.619,sh2=0.731,sh3=0.663,sh4=0.757 A4>A2>A3>A1