Table 3.
Published Accuracy Compared to Relative Accuracy
| Test Method | Published Accuracy | Relative Accuracy | Published FP rate | Relative FP rate | Published FN rate | Relative FN rate | Reference for Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCOP (LLBO) | 83% | 78.1 – 87.8% | 45% | 30.8 – 66.7% | 6% | 2.1 – 9.5% | OECD, 2020a |
| BCOP (OP-KIT) | 69% | 77.0 – 86.0% | 69% | 33.3 – 64.7% | 0% | 6.7 – 12.0% | OECD, 2020a |
| EpiOcular | 80% | 81.0 – 92.2% | 37% | 24.0 – 44.4% | 4% | 2.3 – 3.9% | OECD, 2019a |
| ICE | 88% | 71.4 – 81.4% | 24% | 66.7 –100.0% | 3% | 3.6 – 10.0% | OECD, 2018 |
| OI | 75% | 71.7 – 89.3% | 41% | 39.3 – 47.8% | 9% | 0.0 – 8.7% | OECD, 2019b |
| OS | 79–80% | 78.3 – 93.0% | 40% | 23.1 – 50.0% | 0% | 0.0 – 0.0% | Choksi et al., 2020 |
| STE | 85% | 77.5 – 85.5% | 19% | 0.0 – 17.4% | 12% | 19.7 – 33.3% | OECD, 2020b |
Table 3. Comparison of published statistics versus relative statistics. BCOP = Bovine Corneal Opacity & Permeability; LLBO = Laser Light-Based Opacitometer; ICE = Isolated Chicken Eye; OI = Ocular Irritection; OS = OptiSafe; STE = Short Time Exposure; FP = false positive; FN = false negative.