Table 3.
Final HTC- and Payer-Reported Metrics for Use in Pilot Programs
Payer-Reported Metrics | HTC-Reported Metrics |
---|---|
Cost of factor ● Total factor cost ● Total factor cost per patient ● Site of care ∘Facility (hospital/ED) ∘Ambulatory (infusion center, physician’s office, HTC) ∘Home/self |
Patient classification ● Diagnosis (A or B) ∘Severity (mild, moderate, or severe) ∘Inhibitor status (yes or no) |
Prescribed dose/dispensed dose/weight (± range) when dispensed via a specialty pharmacy ● Product ● Total units ● U/kg ● Units dispensed ● Prescribed dose/dispensed dose ∘±10% according to MASAC guidelines; payers desire ±5% |
Prescribed dose/dispensed dose/weight (± range) when dispensed at an integrated HTC pharmacy ● Product ● Total units ● U/kg ● Units dispensed ● Prescribed dose/dispensed dose ∘±10% according to MASAC guidelines; payers desire ±5% |
ED visits/hospitalizations ● With hemophilia listed as first/second diagnosis code (ie, in first 2 lines of claim) |
ED visits/hospitalizations ● With hemophilia listed as first/second diagnosis code (ie, in first 2 lines of claim) |
Total cost per patient ● Total cost of pharmacy claims ● All other medical claims costs ● Total cost per patient |
Home infusion ● PWH/families independently infusing at home (%) ● PWH/families infusing at home with nursing assistance (%) |
Patient contacts (eg, in person, telephone, e-mail) ● Comprehensive care visits ● Other visits ● Case management contacts ● Collaboration with other providers |
Notes: Reproduced from Tarantino MD, Pindolia VK. Hemophilia management via data collection and reporting: initial findings from the Comprehensive Care Sustainability Collaborative. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017;23(1):51–56. Available from: https://www.jmcp.org/doi/10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.51.59Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; HTC, Hemophilia Treatment Center; MASAC, Medical and Scientific Advisory Council; PWH, person/people with hemophilia.