Table 3. Comparison of the response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and systemic pharmacological treatment in the elderly vs. young patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).
| Tumor | Treatment | Response | Ref. |
| HCC | Sorafenib | Comparable survival benefits and safety | [120, 121] |
| Lenvatinib | Comparable survival benefits and safety | [122] | |
| Regorafenib | Similar survival benefit in HCC patients progressing on sorafenib treatment | [124] | |
| Cabozantinib | Similar OS, PFS and middle-term outcome | [124, 126] | |
| Ramucirumab | Similar OS and safety | [127] | |
| Nivolumab | Similar OS | [128] | |
| Pembrolizumab | Similar OS and PFS | [129] | |
| Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab | Similar OS, PFS and tolerability | [130] | |
| TACE | Good efficacy and tolerance even in >85 | [114, 115] | |
| iCCA | Gem/Cis | Similar OS | [133] |
| Capecitabine | Similar effects when used after surgery | [134] | |
| Lenvatinib | Similar safety | [135] | |
| Pemigatinib | Better PFS | [136] | |
| Ivosidenib | Similar drug disposition | [137] | |
| TACE | Good efficacy and tolerance | [117] |
Gem/Cis, Gemcitabine/Cisplatin; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TACE, trans-arterial chemoembolization.