Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 11;13(19):23416–23434. doi: 10.18632/aging.203620

Table 3. Comparison of the response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and systemic pharmacological treatment in the elderly vs. young patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).

Tumor Treatment Response Ref.
HCC Sorafenib Comparable survival benefits and safety [120, 121]
Lenvatinib Comparable survival benefits and safety [122]
Regorafenib Similar survival benefit in HCC patients progressing on sorafenib treatment [124]
Cabozantinib Similar OS, PFS and middle-term outcome [124, 126]
Ramucirumab Similar OS and safety [127]
Nivolumab Similar OS [128]
Pembrolizumab Similar OS and PFS [129]
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Similar OS, PFS and tolerability [130]
TACE Good efficacy and tolerance even in >85 [114, 115]
iCCA Gem/Cis Similar OS [133]
Capecitabine Similar effects when used after surgery [134]
Lenvatinib Similar safety [135]
Pemigatinib Better PFS [136]
Ivosidenib Similar drug disposition [137]
TACE Good efficacy and tolerance [117]

Gem/Cis, Gemcitabine/Cisplatin; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TACE, trans-arterial chemoembolization.