Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2021 May 21;105:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.04.025

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics

Total Cohort Aβ+ Aβ− p-value

N 310 215 95
Age (years) 74.8 ± 6.8 74.6 ± 6.9 75.5 ± 6.6 0.60
Sex 0.65
 Males 187 (60.3%) 132 (61.4%) 55 (57.9%)
 Females 123 (39.7%) 83 (38.6%) 40 (42.1%)
Diagnosis < 0.001*A
 Cognitively intact (CI) 92 (29.7%) 33 (15.3%) 59 (62.1%)
 Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) 149 (48.1%) 117 (54.4%) 32 (33.7%)
 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) 69 (22.2%) 65 (30.2%) 4 (4.2%)
Apolipoprotein ε4 (APOE4) allele count < 0.001*A
 0 APOE4 alleles 159 (51.3%) 74 (34.4%) 85 (89.5%)
 1 APOE4 alleles 115 (37.1%) 105 (48.8%) 10 (10.5%)
 2 APOE4 alleles 36 (11.6%) 36 (16.7%) 0 (0.0%)
Education (years completed) 15.7 ± 3.0 15.6 ± 3.0 15.8 ± 2.8 0.88
MMSE score 26.8 ± 2.6 26.1 ± 2.6 28.4 ± 1.7 < 0.001*A
CSF VEGF (natural log of pg/mL) 2.70 ± 0.13 2.69 ± 0.13 2.74 ± 0.13 < 0.001*A
CSF t-tau (pg/mL) 98.4 ± 52.1 113.8 ± 54.4 63.4 ± 20.5 < 0.001*A
CSF p-tau (pg/mL) 33.9 ± 17.4 39.7 ± 17.3 20.9 ± 7.6 < 0.001*A

Continuous variables shown as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables shown as frequency (%). Amyloid group level differences (Aβ- vs. Aβ+) were evaluated on continuous variables using a Welch’s two-sample t-test and categorical variables using a χ2 test.

*

indicates p< 0.05 group difference between Aβ- (n=95) vs. Aβ+ (n=215) participants.

A

indicates p< 0.05 between Aβ- (n=42) vs. Aβ+ (n=116) participants in subset with available FDG-PET data.