Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;40(3):1032–1041. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3045295

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The comparison of reconstruction normal cases (left), anomaly (right) of MAMA Net with other baselines. (a) input samples; (b) reconstruction of our MAMA Net; (c) reconstruction of MemAE [14]; (d) reconstruction of AE-ResNet101; (e) reconstruction of AE-VGG16. It can be seen that our proposed network has a similar reconstruction of normal samples and intrinsically different the reconstruction of anomalies, while other baselines cannot make a distinction between reconstruction of normal cases and anomaly.