Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 2;41(11):2986–2999. doi: 10.1177/0271678X211020589

Table 1.

Reliability of Ki, CBF and BOLD changes.

CoV (IQR) [%]
ICC3,1
DICE
FEF IPS OCC FEF IPS OCC Whole brain
Ki
 Rest 5.4 (4.2) 4.6 (2.6) 5.0 (4.0) 0.88 0.89 0.87 -
 Easy vs Rest 26.1 (43.1) 27.9 (43.1) 29.9 (52.2) 0.50 0.52 0.33 0.53
 Hard vs Rest 21.0 (34.8) 17.8 (16.2) 13.6 (21.3) 0.65 0.76 0.65 0.61
CBF
 Rest 10.1 (10.4) 6.4 (10.5) 5.3 (7.8) 0.39 0.69 0.76 -
 Easy vs Rest 38.7 (62.0) 32.4 (28.3) 24.9 (39.3) 0.51 0.43 0.67 0.68
 Hard vs Rest 15.0 (31.8) 25.1 (43.2) 17.5 (24.5) 0.67 0.48 0.72 0.73
BOLD
 Easy vs Rest 31.7 (31.2) 20.5 (37.3) 28.9 (49.8) 0.40 0.45 0.23 0.81
 Hard vs Rest 16.4 (19.5) 21.1 (24.2) 24.5 (20.4) 0.41 0.13 0.09 0.78
 Control vs Rest 22.3 (40.9) 38.9 (49.1) 24.5 (51.4) 0.72 0.44 0.13 0.78
 Easy vs Control 61.4 (80.0) 43.4 (54.8) 40.2 (141.9) –0.06 0.46 0.55 0.35
 Hard vs Control 34.0 (63.7) 33.8 (104.4) 49.4 (51.7) 0.12 –0.08 0.12 0.70

Commonly used metrics for test-retest reliability were estimated, namely median within-subject coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation (ICC) for each ROI and each condition. Additionally, whole-brain DICE coefficient was calculated. At resting state, Ki exhibited the highest reliability. During task performance, reliability dropped but was comparable between Ki and CBF. With BOLD imaging the best performance was achieved with the DICE coefficient, i.e. the qualitative spatial overlap of task effects between measurements.FEF: frontal eye field, IPS: intraparietal sulcus, OCC: occipital cortex.