Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;25(6):1881–1891. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3072076

TABLE I. Comparison Based on Number of Positive and Negative Samples Between Proposed Multilevel Deep-Aggregated Boosted Network (MDA-BN) and Various State-of-the-Art Methods. “N/A” Means “not Available”.

Literature Modality #Scans(#Subjects)
Inline graphicive Inline graphicive
Minaee et al. [6] X-Ray 184(N/A) 5000(N/A)
Khan et al. [7] X-Ray 790(N/A) 802(N/A)
Martínez et al. [8] X-Ray 120(120) 120(120)
Misra et al. [9] X-Ray 184(N/A) 5824(N/A)
Farooq et al. [10] X-Ray 68(45) 5873(2794)
Ardakani et al. [11] CT 510(108) 510(86)
Oh et al. [12] X-Ray 180(118) 322(322)
Singh et al. [13] CT 345(N/A) 315(N/A)
Li et al. [14] CT 305(251) 2370(2344)
Pereira et al. [15] X-Ray 90(N/A) 1054(N/A)
Das et al. [16] X-Ray 162(N/A) 6683(N/A)
Khan et al. [17] X-Ray 284(N/A) 967(N/A)
Asnaoui et al. [18] X-Ray 231(N/A) 5856(N/A)
Brunese et al. [19] X-Ray 250(N/A) 6273(N/A)
Jaiswal et al. [29] CT 1262(60) 1230(60)
Apostolopoulos et al. [30] X-Ray 448(N/A) 2422(N/A)
Tsiknakis et al. [31] X-Ray 122(122) 450(450)
Proposed X-Ray Inline graphicCT 6550(1660) 6360(5272)