Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;9:102327–102344. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097559

TABLE 6. Comparison of COVID-19 Cough Diagnosis.

Ref Disease Method Dataset Size of the data Specificity Sensitivity F1-score Accuracy
[86] COVID-19 Deep Transfer Learning-based Binary Class classifier (DTL-BC) X-rays and CT scans of alive COVID-19 patients, cough sound 1838 Cough sounds and 3597 non-coughs 91.14% 94.57% 92.97% 92.85%
[3] COVID-19 Cross-correlation adaptive algorithm Cough sound and the movement during cough recording 10000 Coughs
[55] SARS and COVID-19 RNN Cough sound 5971 Coughs 78%
[78] COVID-19 SVM Cough sound 570 Coughs 94%
[50] COVID-19 LR, SVM, multilayer perceptron (MLP), CNN, LSTM, and a residual-based neural network architecture (ResNet-50) Cough sound, questionnaire Sample 1(92 COVID-19 positive and 1079 healthy subjects) Sample 2 (8 COVID-19 positive and 13 COVID-19 negative subjects) 96% 91% 92.91%
[51] COVID-19 DNN Cough sound 30000 audio segments, 328 cough sounds from 150 patients with 95.04% 90.1% 96.83%
[35] COVID-19 CNN Cough sound 5,320 Coughs 94.2% 98.5% 97%
[21] COVID-19 CNN Cough sound 1811 Coughs 89% 98% 70% 84%
[81] COVID-19 AI Cough sound 3621 coughs
[89] COVID-19 SVM Cough sound 828 samples from 343 participants 82% 68%