TABLE 3. A Comparison of CNN-BiLSTM’s Performance With Changing Dropout Ratios.
| Dropout ratio | AUC ROC(%) | Acc(%) | MCC | Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 99.81 | 99.95 | 0.9782 | 0.9975 |
| 0.3 | 99.00 | 99.94 | 0.9596 | 0.9775 |
| 0.5 | 99.91 | 99.9 | 0.9782 | 0.9667 |
| Dropout ratio | AUC ROC(%) | Acc(%) | MCC | Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 99.81 | 99.95 | 0.9782 | 0.9975 |
| 0.3 | 99.00 | 99.94 | 0.9596 | 0.9775 |
| 0.5 | 99.91 | 99.9 | 0.9782 | 0.9667 |