TABLE 4. Performance Comparison Using Different Numbers of Filters in CNN.
| Cell numbers | CNN-Bi-LSTM | CNN-LSTM | CNN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sens (%) | 32 | 99.97 | 98.96 | 98.54 |
| 64 | 99.16 | 96.52 | 99.38 | |
| 128 | 99.83 | 97.71 | 97.91 | |
| 256 | 99.97 | 97.71 | 99.33 | |
| Spec (%) | 32 | 99.97 | 98.96 | 98.54 |
| 64 | 99.16 | 96.52 | 99.38 | |
| 128 | 99.97 | 97.71 | 97.91 | |
| 256 | 99.97 | 97.71 | 99.33 | |
| Prec(%) | 32 | 99.91 | 99.26 | 99.82 |
| 64 | 99.92 | 99.26 | 99.92 | |
| 128 | 99.83 | 99.26 | 100.0 | |
| 256 | 99.82 | 99.26 | 99.95 | |
| Acc (%) | 32 | 99.95 | 99.65 | 99.65 |
| 64 | 99.85 | 99.44 | 99.84 | |
| 128 | 99.95 | 98.19 | 99.39 | |
| 256 | 99.95 | 99.74 | 99.89 | |
| AUC ROC (%) | 32 | 99.81 | 93.54 | 91.17 |
| 64 | 100.0 | 91.80 | 96.46 | |
| 128 | 100.0 | 93.91 | 94.67 | |
| 256 | 99.52 | 92.21 | 94.75 | |
| MCC | 32 | 0.9978 | 0.9819 | 0.9778 |
| 64 | 0.9782 | 0.9819 | 0.9964 | |
| 128 | 0.9782 | 0.9819 | 1.000 | |
| 256 | 0.9978 | 0.9819 | 0.9921 | |
| Cohen’s Kappa | 32 | 0.9978 | 0.9814 | 0.9734 |
| 64 | 0.9882 | 0.9380 | 0.9915 | |
| 128 | 0.988 | 0.9582 | 0.9614 | |
| 256 | 0.9978 | 0.9582 | 0.9912 |