Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;2021(10):CD012612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012612.pub2

Page 2012b.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Power analysis undertaken
Recruitment via adverts
2 baselines
Randomisation from computer‐generated random numbers table (concealed envelope). 4 groups (3  different amounts of intervention and a home exercise group)
Education Session COPM and H200 fitted
For this Cochrane Review, we excluded the group who only received a home exercise programme
Participants 36 participants in 4 study arms. 4 participants did not complete, so analysis is of 32
30 minutes per day: n = 9
60 minutes per day: n = 8
120 minutes per day: n = 8
Overall characteristics: mean age 57.6 years; age range 38–75 years; 15 men; mean 53.8 months poststroke; range of onset: 7–324 months; 19 participants exhibiting left‐sided lesions
Outpatient setting
Interventions Intervention was RTP with ESN
The participant carried out most of the intervention. However, they did also participate in a 30‐minute, 1‐hour, or 2‐hour home‐based therapy session (based on their group allocation) and subsequent therapy session for 30 minutes × 2 days per week, every other week, during the intervention phase of the study
The groups received:
RTP and ESN for 30 minutes per day
RTP and ESN for 60 minutes per day
RTP and ESN for 120 minutes per day
All intervention was undertaken every weekday for 8 weeks
Outcomes FMA Upper Extremity section
AMAT
Box and Blocks
ARAT
Measurements taken 1 week before and 1 week after the period of intervention
Only within‐group analysis reported
Notes Page 2012b reports the following pair‐wise comparison from this study: 30 minutes group (n = 4) vs 120 minutes group (n = 8)
Conflicts of interest: none
Funding: award from the American Heart Association.