TABLE 6. Comparison of Thoracic Impedance Measurement Systems.
Range ( ) |
Sensitivity ( ) |
Hardware Implementation | Power (mW) | Size (mm mm) |
Weight (g) | Data Transfer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [83] | 10–10 k | 0.1 | 180 nm | 3.9 | ![]() |
N/A | SRAM |
| [85] | 10–20 | 3 | Discrete | 546 | ![]() |
30 | Bluetooth |
| [89] | 1–1k | 0.1 | Discrete | 406 | ![]() |
200 | Bluetooth |
| [90] | 10–40 | 0.01 | Discrete | 120 | ![]() |
70 | Serial |
| [91] | 1–54 | 0.5 | Discrete | 14 | ![]() |
N/A | RF module |
| 2.4GHz nRF24L01 | |||||||
| [92] | 1–54 | 0.5 | Discrete | N/A | N/Z | N/A | RF module 2.4GHz nRF24L01 |
| [95] | 1–1k | 0.001 | 350 nm | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| [98] | 1–10k | 1 | 130 nm | 3 | ![]() |
12.3 | RF module 433MHz QAM-TX2 |








