Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;2021(10):CD013091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013091.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Andersson 2017 Density change not measured (not defined as a measure between a baseline and a follow‐up mammogram)
Atkinson 1999 Wrong outcomes
Becker 2009 Review
Boisserie‐Lacroix 2008 Article not in English
Boutet 2004 Article not in English
Boyd 2001 Wrong study design
Boyd 2011 Wrong study design
Chlebowski 2003 Wrong study design
Cosmacini 1993 Abstract only; not peer reviewed, insufficient information
Cuzick 2012 Wrong study design
Decensi 2004 Abstract only; not peer reviewed, insufficient information
Decensi 2009 Density change not measured (not defined as a measure between a baseline and a follow‐up mammogram because repeated measures ANOVA was used; additionally digital density was calibrated by adjusting for different variables at different time points, so density was not the same at baseline and follow‐up mammogram)
Ekpo 2016 Wrong outcomes
Engmann 2017 Wrong outcomes
Eriksson 2018 Wrong outcomes
Fabian 2006 Wrong study design
Fabian 2007 Wrong study design
Fabian 2016 Review
Ghosh 2010 Wrong study design
Kanbayti 2019 Review
Kim 2014 Association between MRI density method and risk not validated
Kmietowicz 2013 Editorial about another paper / not primary research data
Macis 2011 Abstract only; not peer reviewed, insufficient information
Martin 2009 Wrong study design
Martin 2016 Abstract only; not peer reviewed, insufficient information
Mullooly 2016 Review
Mullooly 2018 Editorial about another paper / not primary research data
Mullooly 2019 Duplicate study (study participants were a subset of Nyante 2015: "Women in this study were part of a previously conducted case‐control study designed to evaluate the prognostic significance of MD [mammographic density] change")
NCT00066586 Wrong study design
NCT00086749 Wrong outcomes
NCT00114270 Wrong study design
NCT00238316 Wrong study design
NCT00316836 No results posted
NCT00445445 Still recruiting
NCT00516698 Wrong outcomes
NCT01765049 Still recruiting
NCT01773551 Withdrawn
Ozhand 2013 Abstract only; not peer reviewed, insufficient information
Redfern 2016a Wrong study design
Redfern 2016b Abstract only; not peer reviewed, insufficient information
Shawky 2017 Review
Ursin 1996 Wrong outcomes
Vachon 2013a Wrong study design
Vachon 2013b Wrong outcomes
Whitman 2000 Review

ANOVA: analysis of variance
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging