Table 3.
Categories and indicators associated with the low satisfaction of the use of the software.
| Weaknesses, associated with: | ni | % |
|---|---|---|
|
C1. Software management |
84 | - |
|
D1. Complicated, difficult |
84 | 41.4 |
|
C2. Student motivation and involvement |
78 | - |
| D2. The software is boring, tedious and lacks usefulness | 17 | 8.4 |
| D3. No face-to-face classes: lack of peer interaction | 24 | 11.8 |
|
D4. Lack of immediate feedback from the teacher |
37 | 18.2 |
|
C6. Limitations of the software as an educational resource |
56 | - |
| D5. Free version of the software is limited | 26 | 12.8 |
| D6. Aimed at other professionals | 21 | 10.3 |
|
D7. Requires installation |
9 |
4.4 |
| Threats, associated with: |
ni |
% |
|
C9. External risks |
169 | - |
| A1. Digital gap | 26 | 12.8 |
| A2. Impossibility of using the software including all its features without purchasing its license | 57 | 28.1 |
| A3. The online version of the software generates distrust. | 31 | 15.6 |
|
A4. Existence of other more attractive programmes |
55 | 27.1 |
|
C8- Professional development |
33 | - |
| A5. This software is not appropriate for the teaching profession | 33 | 16.3 |