Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):1640–1655. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001076

Table 2:

Univariate comparisons of the LiD subgroups with (Dx) and without (noDx) an auditory processing disorder or weakness. Test statistics include W for Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests and t values for t-tests. Reported p-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.

noDx Dx
N Mean 95% CI N Mean 95% CI Test Stat. p d
ECLiPS Composite Scores
Total 47 3.00 2.54, 3.45 20 2.85 1.90, 3.80 t = 0.32 0.753 0.08

SCAN-3:C
Comp. 43 95.12 91.65, 98.58 16 94.13 87.23, 101.02 t = 0.31 0.784 0.08

LiSN-S Cue Scores
Low 44 −0.64 −1.02, −0.27 20 −0.97 −1.38, −0.55 t = 1.02 0.313 0.27
LiSN-S Advantage Scores
Spatial 44 −0.61 −1.12, −0.10 20 −0.75 −1.49, −0.01 t = 0.31 0.761 0.08
Talker 44 −0.60 −0.86, −0.34 20 −0.42 −0.95, 0.11 t = −0.67 0.506 0.18

NIH Cognition Toolbox Tests
AVL 25 −0.85 −1.59, −0.12 16 −2.47 −3.52, −1.42 t = −2.55 0.015 0.82
NIH Cognition Toolbox Composite Scores
Fluid 30 85.15 79.60, 90.70 15 84.50 74.85, 94.15 t = 0.12 0.904 0.04
Cryst. 37 94.47 91.13, 97.81 17 87.99 80.76, 95.21 W = 194.5 0.026 0.54
EC 34 90.83 86.50, 95.17 14 84.43 75.54, 93.32 t = 1.42 0.162 0.45