Abstract
HIV-1 vaccine design aims to develop an immunogen that elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies against a desired epitope, while eliminating responses to off-target regions of HIV-1 Env. We report characterization of Ab1245, an off-target antibody against the Env gp120-gp41 interface, from V3-glycan patch immunogen-primed and boosted macaques. A 3.7 Å cryo-EM structure of an Ab1245-Env complex reveals one Ab1245 Fab binding asymmetrically to Env trimer at the gp120-gp41 interface using its long CDRH3 to mimic regions of gp41. The mimicry includes positioning of a CDRH3 methionine into the gp41 tryptophan clasp, resulting in displacement of the fusion peptide and fusion peptide-proximal region. Despite fusion peptide displacement, Ab1245 is non-neutralizing even at high concentrations, raising the possibility that only two fusion peptides per trimer are required for viral–host membrane fusion. These structural analyses facilitate immunogen design to prevent elicitation of Ab1245-like antibodies that block neutralizing antibodies against the fusion peptide.
Subject terms: Protein vaccines, Antibodies
Introduction
Recent efforts in vaccine design for the HIV-1 virus have focused on developing neutralizing adaptive immune responses to the HIV-1 Env glycoprotein via sequential immunization1–3. Studies of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) isolated from HIV + human donors have informed immunogen design efforts for various epitopes on the Env trimer, including the V3-glycan patch4,5, the fusion peptide (FP)6,7, and the CD4-binding site8,9. In some cases, on-target antibody responses are accompanied by off-target responses in which antibodies are made against undesired epitopes on the Env trimer including the ‘bottom’ or ‘base’ epitope10 and/or a minimally-glycosylated region (glycan ‘hole’)11. These antibodies target immunodominant but non-neutralizing epitopes and therefore do not contribute meaningfully to a neutralizing antibody response.
We previously described the design and characterization of RC1, a BG505 SOSIP.66412-based engineered immunogen targeting the V3-glycan patch on the gp120 subunit of Env trimer4. We showed that RC1 and/or RC1-4fill (modified from RC1 to include additional potential N-linked glycosylation sites; PNGSs) that had been multimerized on virus-like particles (VLPs) elicited antibodies that recognized the V3-glycan patch in wild-type mice, rabbits, and non-human primates (NHPs)4. We subsequently boosted a subset of RC1-4fill-primed NHPs, isolated single Env-specific B cells, and derived antibody sequences from which monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were produced13. Here, we describe a single-particle cryo-EM structure of a BG505 Env trimer bound to a monoclonal antibody (Ab1245) isolated from a rhesus macaque after a sequential immunization protocol that included multimerized HIV-1 SOSIP Envs derived from different clades. Ab1245 binds to an epitope overlapping with the FP-targeting bNAb VRC346 at the interface of the Env gp41 and gp120 subunits, but unlike VRC34, Ab1245 displaces the FP and fusion peptide-proximal region (FPPR). In addition, Ab1245 contains a methionine residue that structurally mimics Met530gp41, a key residue for the stability of the Env trimer, by engaging the “tryptophan clasp” formed by three gp41 tryptophan residues14,15. Despite inducing FP rearrangement and overlap with the neutralizing VRC34 epitope, Ab1245 did not neutralize BG505 or other viral strains, perhaps because of its sub-stoichiometric binding to Env trimer. These previously unseen features of gp120-gp41 interface antibodies demonstrate that HIV-1 Env can elicit non-neutralizing antibodies that block a neutralizing epitope, inform immunogen design protocols to prevent elicitation of similar antibodies, and provide potential mechanistic insight into HIV-1 Env-mediated fusion of the host and viral membranes.
Results and discussion
Sequential immunization after RC1-4-fill priming elicited Ab1245, a non-V3-targeting antibody
We previously described a V3-glycan patch targeting immunogen, RC1, which was modified from a designed V3 immunogen, 11MUTB16, by removing the N-linked glycan attached to gp120 residue N156gp1204. Both RC1 and 11MUTB were derived from clade A BG505 SOSIP.664 native-like Env trimers12. RC1-4fill and 11MUTB-4fill were modified from RC1 and 11MUTB, respectively, to reduce antibody responses to off-target epitopes11,17–19 by inserting PNGSs to add glycans to residues 230gp120, 241 gp120, 289gp120, and 344gp1204. In addition, to enhance avidity effects and limit antibody access to the Env trimer base, we multimerized immunogens on VLPs using the SpyTag-SpyCatcher system20,21. Four NHPs primed with RC1-4fill-VLPs4 were boosted sequentially with (i) VLPS coupled with 11MUTB-4fill16 (clade A), (ii) VLPs coupled with B41 SOSIP (clade B), and (iii) VLPs coupled with a mixture of AMC011 and DU422 SOSIPs (clades B and C) over the course of 9 months22 (Fig. 1a).
The sequences of the heavy and light chains of Ab1245 were generated by single-cell cloning from B cells isolated from one of the boosted NHPs that were captured using BG505 and B41 SOSIPs as baits as described13,22 (Fig. 1b). The heavy and light chains were derived from the macaque V gene segments IGHV4-2*01 and IGLV9-1*01, respectively, and exhibited 14% (heavy chain) and 5% (light chain) amino acid changes due to somatic hypermutation. Of note, the third complementarity region (CDR) of the heavy chain (CDRH3) was longer than typical macaque CDRH3s (24 residues compared with an average of 13–15 residues23).
One Ab1245 Fab binds to each BG505 SOSIP trimer
To determine the binding stoichiometry for the Ab1245 Fab interaction with BG505 SOSIP trimer, we derived the absolute molecular mass of BG505-Ab1245 Fab complexes using size-exclusion chromatography combined with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS). When BG505 was incubated overnight with a threefold molar excess of Ab1245 Fab (three Fabs per gp120-gp41 protomer), we observed a heterogeneous mixture corresponding to zero to one Ab1245 Fabs bound per trimer, whereas incubation with 8ANC195 Fab resulted in a homogeneous complex corresponding to three Fabs per trimer (Fig. 1c), as expected from previous stoichiometry measurements and structures24–26. To verify that one or more Ab1245 Fabs per trimer did not dissociate during the chromatography procedure required for SEC-MALS, we used mass photometry, a technique that derives approximate masses for individual proteins and complexes in solution27, to measure the molecular masses of BG505 alone and complexed with Ab1245 or with control Fabs: 8ANC195 (three Fabs per BG505 trimer)24–26 and BG1 (two Fabs per BG505 trimer)24. Consistent with the SEC-MALS results, mass photometry experiments suggested zero to one Ab1245 Fabs bound to each wild-type BG505 trimer and to a N611A mutant BG505 trimer (Fig. 1d). We conclude that Ab1245 Fab binds asymmetrically to Env with one or zero Fabs per trimer.
Ab1245 binds at the gp120-gp41 interface
To further characterize the Ab1245 epitope on HIV-1 Env, we solved a single-particle cryo-EM structure of Ab1245 Fab bound to a BG505 Env trimer. To form complexes, we incubated a threefold molar excess of Ab1245 Fab with BG505, followed by an incubation with a threefold excess of 8ANC19528 Fab to add mass to the complex and prevent problems associated with preferred orientation bias (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1c). This resulted in complex formation with three 8ANC195 Fabs and one Ab1245 Fab bound per BG505 trimer (Fig. 2a), consistent with the stoichiometry experiments (Fig. 1c, d). The complex with one Ab1245 Fab per BG505 trimer was resolved at 3.7 Å resolution and showed generally well-defined side-chain density throughout the complex (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 1f). An additional 3D class of BG505 trimers was observed with three bound 8ANC195 Fabs and no Ab1245 Fabs (Supplementary Fig. 1e).
Table 1.
Ab1245–BG505–8ANC195 | |
---|---|
PDB | 7MXE |
EMD | 24,072 |
Data collection conditions | |
Microscope | Titan Krios |
Camera | Gatan K3 Summit |
Magnification | 105,000× |
Voltage (kV) | 300 |
Recording mode | Counting |
Dose rate (e−/pixel/s) | 25 |
Electron dose (e−/Å2) | 60 |
Defocus range (µm) | 0.8–2.5 |
Pixel size (Å) | 0.866 |
Micrographs collected | 2307 |
Micrographs used | 2260 |
Total extracted particles | 421,388 |
Refined particles | 172,731 |
Symmetry imposed | C1 |
Nominal Resolution (Å) | |
FSC 0.5 (unmasked/masked) | 3.9/3.7 |
FSC 0.143 (unmasked/masked) | 3.6/3.5 |
Refinement and validation | |
Initial model used | 5CJX, 6NC3 |
Number of atoms | 22,149 |
Protein (residues) | 2632 |
Ligands | BMA:11; NAG:87; MAN:30 |
MapCC (global/local) | 0.81/.73 |
Map sharpening B-factor | 171 |
R.m.s. deviations | |
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.003 |
Bond angles (˚) | 0.598 |
MolProbity score | 1.42 |
Clashscore (all atom) | 4.2 |
Poor rotamers (%) | 0.35 |
Ramachandran plot | |
Favored (%) | 96.59 |
Allowed (%) | 3.37 |
Disallowed (%) | 0.04 |
The Ab1245-BG505-8ANC195 complex structure revealed non-overlapping epitopes at the gp120-gp41 interface for Ab1245 and 8ANC195 (Fig. 2a, b). The Ab1245 Fab was located at the interface between the gp120 and gp41 of its primary Env protomer and the gp41 of a neighboring protomer (Figs. 2c, 3a). By contrast, 8ANC195 recognized the gp120-gp41 interface of a single protomer with no contacts to neighboring protomers (Figs. 2a, 3a), and equivalent interactions with the three BG505 protomers26. The Ab1245 epitope overlaps with that of VRC34, a FP-directed bNAb that binds with a three Fab per Env trimer stoichiometry at a site that is located closer to the trimer base6 than the Ab1245 epitope (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Fig. 2a). The Ab1245 heavy chain made the majority of contacts with BG505 (only three light chain residues contact BG505), and all but one of the 19 heavy and light chain contact residues were located within CDRs rather than antibody framework regions (FWRs) (Figs. 1b, 3b). The Ab1245 CDRH1 and CDRH2 loops formed extensive interactions with a portion of gp120 between residues Pro79gp120 and Glu87gp120 (Fig. 3c), while the long (24-amino acid) CDRH3 loop contacted gp41 residues as well as residues at the termini of gp120 that fit inside the previously defined membrane-proximal collar14 (Fig. 3d). The Ab1245 light chain made contacts with the terminal helix of an adjacent gp41 subunit, which had undergone a change in conformation from a helix to an unstructured region that was partially disordered, suggesting the possibility that the gp41 helix conformation sterically interferes with binding, as was also proposed for the interaction of the human bNAb 3BC315 with BG505 Env trimer29 (Fig. 3a, e). The majority of the Ab1245 Fab contacts with BG505 were contacts to protein residues, with the only glycan contact involving the third FWR of the antibody heavy chain (FRWH3) with a terminal sugar on the Asn448gp120 glycan (Fig. 3a). By contrast, the 8ANC195 epitope includes required contacts with glycans attached to residues Asn276gp120 and Asn234gp12026,30, and the VRC34 epitope includes contacts with glycans at residues Asn88 gp120 and Asn241 gp1206 (Figs. 3a, 2d). The possibility that an N-glycan attached to Asn611gp41 could occlude Ab1245 Fab binding was suggested by a lack of density for this glycan on the primary Ab1245-binding protomer compared with density for one GlcNAc attached to the Asn611gp41 residues on the other two protomers (Supplementary Fig. 2b). However, only one Ab1245 Fab bound to a soluble BG505N611A trimer (Fig. 1d), implying that the presence of the Asn611gp41 glycan does not account for sub-stoichiometric binding of Ab1245 to Env trimers.
The Ab1245 CDRH3 contains a gp41 mimicry motif
Unlike binding of the FP-specific bNAb VRC346 or any other reported HIV-1 antibody, Ab1245 binding to BG505 Env trimer resulted in the displacement of the FP (residues 512gp41–527gp41) and FPPR (residues 528gp41–540gp41) of the gp41 subunit within the primary protomer to which Ab1245 was bound (Fig. 4a, b). The FP/FPPR displacement resulted from intercalation of the Ab1245 CDRH3 (Fig. 4a). Although the gp41 residues of HR1N (547gp41–568gp41) are usually disordered in structures of Env trimer (except when an interface antibody is bound), residues N-terminal to this region, 520gp41–546gp41, are ordered whether or not the Env was complexed with a gp120-gp41 interface antibody (e.g.31,32). In the Ab1245-BG505 complex structure, there was no observed density for residues spanning 512gp41–565gp41 on the primary gp41 to which Ab1245 was bound, thus both regions of gp41 were disordered. The disorder resulted from Ab1245 binding because residues 520gp41 to 546gp41 were resolved in the two adjacent gp41 subunits (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 2c).
One of the disordered gp41 residues in the Ab1245-BG505–8ANC195 structure, Met530gp41, normally inserts into the gp41 ‘tryptophan clasp’ formed by residues Trp623gp41, Trp628gp41, and Trp631gp4114,15 (Fig. 4b). The tryptophan clasp has been hypothesized to be a key interaction that stabilizes the Env trimer in both its closed, prefusion conformation and its CD4-bound open conformation, and it has been speculated that the disengagement of Met530gp41 from the tryptophan clasp triggers elongation of HR1 into a full-length helix and the large rearrangement of the FP required for insertion into the host membrane14,15. However, the primary protomer to which Ab1245 is bound contained a disengaged Met530gp41, but adopted most structural characteristics of a closed, prefusion Env trimer (Fig. 2a, b). The limited structural changes in Ab1245-bound BG505 from other closed Env trimer structures included disorder of the gp41 FP and FPPR regions, a transition to an unstructured secondary structure in a gp41 terminal helix, a shift in the N88gp120 glycan, and absence of density for the N611gp41 glycan (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). The stability of the Ab1245-bound BG505 trimer in the closed conformation despite the displacement of Met530gp41 from the tryptophan clasp is rationalized by the insertion of an Ab1245 CDRH3 residue, Met100c1245 HC, into the gp41 tryptophan clasp to mimic Env residue Met530gp41 (Fig. 4a, c).
Some HIV-1 gp120-gp41 interface-binding antibodies induce dissociation of Env trimers into protomers after incubation for 30 min to several hours29,33. Disruption of residue(s) within the gp41 tryptophan clasp was hypothesized to be the mechanism by which these antibodies induce trimer dissociation29,34,35. Indeed, Met530gp41, which is part of the disordered gp41 region that is displaced by Ab1245 binding, has been implicated as an important anchoring residue that mediates gp41 dynamics36. However, we found no dissociation of Env trimers into protomers in the cryo-EM structure of the Ab1245-BG505-8ANC195 complex that was derived after an overnight incubation of BG505 with Fabs or indication of dissociated protomers by SEC-MALS (Fig. 1c). We hypothesize that disruption of the tryptophan clasp by Ab1245 does not induce trimer dissociation because insertion of its CDRH3 residue Met100c1245 HC mimics gp41 Met530gp41 to stabilize the tryptophan clasp conformation (Fig. 4a–c).
Ab1245 IgG is non-neutralizing
Although Ab1245 Fab bound to BG505 SOSIP Env (Fig. 1c, d), we observed no neutralization of a BG505 pseudovirus at Ab1245 IgG concentrations up to 1 mg/mL (Fig. 4d). In addition, we observed no neutralization by Ab1245 Fab at concentrations up to 100 μg/mL for eight strains of pseudovirus. The location of the Ab1245 epitope and its angle of approach for binding to BG505 SOSIP predicts no steric occlusion with the membrane of a virion (Fig. 2a, b). Since the conformations of membrane-bound and SOSIP Env trimers are similar37–39, the lack of neutralization of Ab1245 cannot be ascribed to Ab1245 failing to bind to Env trimers on virions.
A recent report described RM20E1, an antibody isolated from BG505-immunized NHPs, which neutralized an N611Agp41 mutant strain of BG505, but not the wild-type version of BG50540. In common with Ab1245, RM20E1 binds BG505 SOSIP sub-stoichiometrically at an epitope that overlaps with the Ab1245 epitope, but it does not displace the FP or FPPR. To determine whether the Asn611gp41 glycan interferes with Ab1245 neutralization of BG505 or viral strains containing a glycan at this position, we also evaluated neutralization of Ab1245 against a BG505N611A strain and eight other HIV-1 strains that lack a PNGS at position 611gp41. We observed no neutralization by Ab1245 IgG against any of the viral strains under conditions in which a positive control IgG exhibited neutralization (Fig. 4d).
The fact that the Ab1245 was elicited by a SOSIP immunogen implies that non-neutralizing gp41-mimicking antibodies could be raised during other vaccination experiments. Important features of Ab1245 that allow its gp41 mimicry include a long CDRH3 with a methionine roughly in the middle (Met100c1245 HC is the 11th residue of the 24 amino acid CDRH3). A search of the Protein Data Bank41 for Fab structures with features of the Ab1245 CDRH3 (22–26 residue length and a methionine at position 7–13) revealed three of 1657 Fabs with these features (PDBs 5CEZ, 6E4X, and 2XTJ). However, the conformations of the CDRH3s of these Fabs did not resemble the Ab1245 CDRH3 conformation. Given that the features required for Ab1245 mimicry of gp41 are apparently rare (i.e., not found in a survey of other antibody structures), Ab1245 CDRH3 characteristics (~24 residue CDRH3 with a methionine at position ~11) could be used to screen elicited antibody sequences to identify Ab1245-like antibodies that are likely to be non-neutralizing. In addition, the Ab1245-BG505 complex structure could inform the engineering of SOSIP immunogens to prevent displacement of the FP and FPPR residues surrounding Met530gp41.
Our results suggest that Ab1245 binds to at least some strains of Env trimer (e.g., BG505) on virions, but does not affect entry into target cells. Since only one Ab1245 Fab binds per Env trimer at a site that would not disrupt CD4 binding, Env trimers should still be able to undergo CD4-induced conformational changes42–45 allowing coreceptor binding and subsequent insertion of one or two of the trimer FPs into the host cell membrane. This prompts the speculation that fusion requires only up to two of three FPs to be inserted into the target membrane. However, it is also possible that the third FP, which was displaced by Ab1245 binding and is disordered in the Ab1245-BG505 structure (Fig. 4a), could access the host cell membrane and insert itself despite Ab1245 binding, thus enabling all three FPs per Ab1245-bound Env trimer to function in membrane fusion. Alternatively, Ab1245 may dissociate from a virion-bound Env trimer upon its interaction with CD4, providing another potential mechanism rationalizing its lack of neutralizing activity.
The characterization of Ab1245 reported here raises the possibility that a neutralizing antibody against the FP epitope must directly bind the FP in order to prevent it from inserting into the host cell membrane. Thus the displacement of the FP and FPPR by an antibody such as Ab1245 through gp41 mimicry may not result in neutralization. However, by blocking neutralizing antibodies such as VRC34, an antibody that directly interacts with the FP6, from binding HIV-1 Envs, Ab1245 and similar antibodies might serve as decoys that protect a conserved epitope on Env from binding neutralizing antibodies.
Methods
Single B cell sorting and antibody sequencing
Cells from lymph node biopsies obtained from immunized macaques were thawed and washed in RPMI medium 1640 (1×) (Gibco #11875–093). Macaque cells were incubated with 100 μl of FACS buffer (PBS 1× with 2% fetal bovine serum and 1 mM EDTA) with human Fc Block (BD Biosciences #564219) at a 1:500 dilution for 30 min on ice.
BG505 and B41 tetrameric baits were prepared by incubating 5 μg of AviTagged and biotinylated BG505 and B41 SOSIP trimers with fluorophore-conjugated streptavidin at a 1:200 dilution in 1xPBS for 30 min on ice4,46. Tetramers were mixed with the following anti-human antibody cocktail: anti-CD16 APC-eFluor780 (Invitrogen, #47–0168–41), anti-CD8α APC-eFluor780 (Invitrogen, #47-0086-42), anti-CD3 APC-eFluor780 (Invitrogen, #47-0037-41), anti-CD14 APC-eFluor780 (eBiosciences, #47-0149-41), anti-CD20 PeCy7 (BD, #335793), anti-CD38 FITC (Stem Cell technologies, #60131FI) at a 1:200 dilution and the live/dead marker Zombie NIR at a 1:400 dilution in FACS buffer.
Zombie NIR−/CD16−/CD8a−/CD3−/CD14−/CD20+/CD38+/ double BG505+ and B41+ single cells were isolated from the macaque cell homogenates using a FACS Aria III (Becton Dickinson). Single cells were sorted into individual wells of a 96-well plate containing 5 μl of lysis buffer (TCL buffer (Qiagen #1031576) with 1% of 2-b-mercaptoethanol). Plates were immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C.
Antibody sequencing and cloning were performed4. Assignments of V, D, and J genes, percent mutated from germline sequences, and identification of CDR loops for Fig. 1b were done using IMGT/V-QUEST analysis using genes from the species macaca mulatta47–49. Percent change from germline does not include a one-amino acid insertion in the Ab1245 heavy chain. Antibody residues were numbered according to the Kabat convention50.
Protein expression
Fabs (Ab1245, 8ANC195, BG1) and IgGs (Ab1245, N6) were expressed and purified51. IgGs and 6xHis-tagged Fabs were expressed by transient transfection of paired heavy chain and light chain expression plasmids into HEK293-6E (National Research Council of Canada) or Expi293F cells (GIBCO; Cat#A14527). Fabs and IgGs were purified from transfected cell supernatants using Ni-NTA (GE Healthcare) (for Fabs) or protein A (GE Healthcare) (for IgG) affinity chromatography followed by SEC on a Superdex 200 16/60 column (GE Healthcare). Proteins were stored in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and 150 mM sodium chloride (TBS buffer).
BG505 SOSIP.664, a soluble clade A gp140 trimer that includes ‘SOS’ substitutions (A501Cgp120, T605Cgp41), the ‘IP’ substitution (I559Pgp41), the N-linked glycan sequence at residue 332gp120 (T332Ngp120), an enhanced gp120-gp41 cleavage site (REKR to RRRRRR), and a stop codon after residue 664gp41 (Env numbering according to HX nomenclature)12 was expressed in a stable CHO cell line (kind gift of John Moore, Weill Cornell Medical College)52. BG505N611A SOSIP was expressed by transient transfection in Expi-293 cells26. SOSIP proteins were isolated from cell supernatants using a 2G12 immunoaffinity column made by covalently coupling 2G12 IgG monomer to an NHS-activated Sepharose column (GE Healthcare). Protein was eluted with 3 M MgCl2 followed by buffer exchange into TBS, and trimers were purified using Superdex 200 16/60 SEC (GE Healthcare), and then stored in TBS.
SEC-MALS
Purified BG5505 SOSIP and BG505-Fab complexes were characterized by SEC-MALS to determine absolute molecular masses53. For complexes, BG505 SOSIP.664 was mixed with a threefold molar excess of Ab1245 Fab or 8ANC195 Fab relative to BG505 trimer in TBS. Complexes were incubated overnight at room temperature and injected onto a Superdex 200 10/300 GL gel-filtration chromatography column equilibrated with TBS. The chromatography column was connected with an 18-angle light-scattering detector (DAWN HELEOS II; Wyatt Technology), a dynamic light-scattering detector (DynaPro Nanostar; Wyatt Technology), and a refractive index detector (Optilab t-rEX; Wyatt Technology). Data were collected every second at 25 °C at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Calculated molecular masses were obtained by data analysis using the program ASTRA 6 (Wyatt Techonology).
Mass photometry
Microscope coverslips (No. 1.5, 24 × 50 mm, VWR) were cleaned by sequential rinsing with Milli-Q H2O followed by isopropanol and again Milli-Q H2O followed by drying using a filtered pressured air stream. Clean coverslips were assembled using CultureWell™ reusable silicon gaskets (Grace Bio-Labs, # 103250). Measurements were performed using a OneMP mass photometer (Refeyn Ltd, Oxford, UK). Immediately before each measurement, wells were filled with 15 µl TBS buffer. The focal position was identified and secured in place with an autofocus system based on total internal reflection for the entire measurement. Immediately following the focusing procedure, 1 µl of protein solution was added and gently mixed by pipetting up and down three times at a 5 µl mixing volume. Calibration standards (1 µM Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) SIGMA #23209, 500 nM apoferritin SIGMA #A3360, and Thyroglobulin SIGMA #T9145) were measured first. SOSIP-Fab complexes (incubated at 7 µM SOSIP and ~7.7 µM Fab for either 2–5 days or for 1–2 h and subsequently diluted 1:6 in TBS) was added to the 15 µl PBS buffer in the well resulting in an ~114 nM concentration with respect to the SOSIP unless indicated otherwise. Recording of a mass photometry movie was started immediately. Data acquisition was performed using AcquireMP 2.2.0 software (Refeyn Ltd.), and data analysis was carried out using DiscoverMP 2.2.0 software (Refeyn Ltd.). The resulting mass photometry graphs were evaluated and protein complex masses were determined against the BSA/apoferritin calibration measurements carried out on the same day.
Complex formation and cryo-EM data collection
Ab1245-BG505 complex was prepared by adding a threefold molar excess of Ab1245 Fab (Fab to BG505 protomer) to CHO-expressed BG505 SOSIP.664 isolated from the second half of a monodisperse SEC peak. This mixture was incubated at room temperature for three hours, after which a threefold molar excess of 8ANC195 Fab to BG505 protomer was added and the complex was incubated at room temperature overnight. The Ab1245-BG505-8ANC195 complex was then purified using size-exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200) and concentrated to 4.7 mg/mL before vitrification on a freshly glow discharged (15 mA for 1 min, Ted Pella PELCO easiGLOW) Quantifoil R 2/2 300 mesh Cu grid (Electron Microscopy Services). Samples were vitrified using a Mark IV Vitrobot (Thermo Fisher) in 100% liquid ethane after a 3 s blot with Whatman No. 1 filter paper at 22 °C and 100% humidity. Micrograph movies were collected on a Titan Krios using SerialEM54 automated collection software with a K3 camera (Gatan) operating in super-resolution mode at a nominal magnification of ×105,000 (0.433 Å/pixel) using a defocus range of −0.8 to −2.5 µm. The dose was 1.5 e-/Å2 over 40 frames, resulting in a total dose of 60 e-/Å2. Data collection conditions are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
Cryo-EM data processing
Processing was carried out entirely within Relion-355,56. First, micrograph movies were motion corrected, dose-weighted, and binned to 0.866 Å/pixel using Motioncor257, and then the non-dose-weighted micrographs were used for CTF estimation using Gctf58. Micrographs with poor CTF fits or signs of crystalline ice were discarded. Selected micrographs then underwent auto-picking after which 4 × 4 binned particles were extracted (3.46 Å/pixel). These particles were then subjected to reference-free 2D classification after which selected particles underwent three rounds of iterative 3D classification, wherein only the final particles representing Ab1245–BG505–8ANC195 were selected and unbinned (0.866 Å/pixel) and classes representing BG505-8ANC195 were discarded (one is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1e). After the first round of 3D classification, 69% of particles belonged to classes that resembled a trimer with one bound Ab1245 Fab and three bound 8ANC195 Fabs, 29% of particles belonged to a class that resembled a trimer with three bound 8ANC195 Fabs but no bound Ab1245 Fabs, and 2% of particles belonged to a class that did not resemble a trimer. In the second and third rounds of 3D classification, some classes appeared to show density for a second 1245 Fab at less than full occupancy, but these classes did not contain a large proportion of particles and were not readily interpretable. Finally, the unbinned particles underwent 3D refinement (C1 symmetry imposed) and were post-processed into a map with a gold-standard FSC calculation59 of 3.7 Å. A ‘blurred’ map was also created using a higher B-factor to uncover N-linked glycan densities.
Model building
Coordinates of BG505-8ANC195 Fab VH-VL domains (PDB 5CJX) and VRC34 Fab VH-VL domains (PDB 6NC3) were fitted into map density using UCSF Chimera60. Coordinates were then built into densities using iterative rounds of refinement in Phenix61 (rigid body and real-space refinement) and Coot62. Antibody numbering was done in the Kabat convention using the online ANARCI server63.
Structural analysis
Structure figures were made using UCSF Chimera60 or PyMol64. Contact residues were assigned as residues with any atom located <4.0 Å from an atom in a residue on the partner molecule. Hydrogen bond interactions were not assigned due to limited resolution.
In vitro neutralization assays
Pseudovirus neutralization assays were conducted65 either in-house (for strains BG505, BG505N611A, CE0217, CNE55, JRCSF, Du422, T250-4, Tro, X1632, 246F3, CH119, CE1176, BJOX002000_03_02, 25710, X2278, CNE8, and 398F1) or by the Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery (CAVD) core neutralization facility (for the remaining strains in Fig. 4d). IgGs (Ab1245 and an N666 positive control) were evaluated in duplicate with an eight-point, fourfold dilution series starting at a top concentration of 500 or 1000 µg/mL for in-house neutralizations or an eight-point, fivefold dilution series starting at a top concentration of 250 µg/mL at the CAVD facility.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Anthony P. West for help with the analysis of antibody CDRH3 sequence analyses. Cryo-EM was performed in the Beckman Institute Resource Center for Transmission Electron Microscopy at Caltech with assistance from directors A. Malyutin and S. Chen. We thank the Beckman Institute Protein Expression Center at Caltech for protein production, John Moore (Weill Cornell Medical College) for the BG505 stable cell line, Gabriella Kiss, Sofia Ferreira, and Brenda Watt at Refeyn Ltd. for providing a demonstration model OneMP mass photometer, training, and materials to Caltech, Kristie M. Gordon (The Rockefeller University) for assistance with flow cytometry, and Rogier W. Sanders and Marit J. van Gils (Academisch Medisch Centrum Universiteit van Amsterdam) for providing AviTagged and biotinylated BG505 and B41 SOSIP trimers. This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) HIVRAD P01 AI100148 (to P.J.B. and M.C.N.), Gates CAVD grant INV-002143 (to P.J.B., M.C.N., and M.A.M.), NIH P50 AI150464 (P.J.B.), an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (to M.E.A.), and a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant (#OPP1146996 to M.S.S.). M.C.N. is an HHMI Investigator. This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant INV-002143). Under the grant conditions of the Gates Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.
Author contributions
M.E.A. and P.J.B. designed the research. M.E.A., H.B.G., J.V., J.R.K., and Y.E.L. performed biophysical experiments. M.E.A., H.B.G., J.V., J.R.K., and P.J.B. analyzed the results. P.N.P.G. and M.S.S. carried out and supervised in vitro neutralization assays. A.E. and M.C.N. carried out and supervised the derivation of monoclonal antibody sequences and plasmids from NHPs. R.G. and M.A.M. planned and supervised the immunization experiments in NHPs. M.E.A and P.J.B. wrote the manuscript with input from co-authors.
Data availability
The atomic model and cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession code 7MXE and Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) entry EMD-24072.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41541-021-00387-4.
References
- 1.Andrabi R, Bhiman JN, Burton DR. Strategies for a multi-stage neutralizing antibody-based HIV vaccine. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2018;53:143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Escolano A, Dosenovic P, Nussenzweig MC. Progress toward active or passive HIV-1 vaccination. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:3–16. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kwong PD, Mascola JR. HIV-1 vaccines based on antibody identification, B cell ontogeny, and epitope structure. Immunity. 2018;48:855–871. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Escolano A, et al. Immunization expands B cells specific to HIV-1 V3 glycan in mice and macaques. Nature. 2019;570:468–473. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1250-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Steichen JM, et al. A generalized HIV vaccine design strategy for priming of broadly neutralizing antibody responses. Science. 2019;366:eaax4380. doi: 10.1126/science.aax4380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kong R, et al. Fusion peptide of HIV-1 as a site of vulnerability to neutralizing antibody. Science. 2016;352:828–833. doi: 10.1126/science.aae0474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu K, et al. Epitope-based vaccine design yields fusion peptide-directed antibodies that neutralize diverse strains of HIV-1. Nat. Med. 2018;24:857–867. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0042-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jardine J, et al. Rational HIV immunogen design to target specific germline B cell receptors. Science. 2013;340:711–716. doi: 10.1126/science.1234150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McGuire AT, et al. Specifically designed immunogens select and activate B cells expressing precursors of broadly neutralizing human antibodies to HIV-1 in knock-in mice. Nat. Comm. 2016;7:10618. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bianchi M, et al. Electron-microscopy-based epitope mapping defines specificities of polyclonal antibodies elicited during HIV-1 BG505 envelope trimer immunization. Immunity. 2018;49:288–300.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McCoy LE, et al. Holes in the glycan shield of the native HIV envelope are a target of trimer-elicited neutralizing antibodies. Cell Rep. 2016;16:2327–2338. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sanders RW, et al. A next-generation cleaved, soluble HIV-1 Env Trimer, BG505 SOSIP.664 gp140, expresses multiple epitopes for broadly neutralizing but not non-neutralizing antibodies. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003618. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang Z, et al. Isolation of single HIV-1 Envelope specific B cells and antibody cloning from immunized rhesus macaques. J. Immunol. Methods. 2020;478:112734. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2019.112734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pancera M, et al. Structure and immune recognition of trimeric pre-fusion HIV-1 Env. Nature. 2014;514:455–461. doi: 10.1038/nature13808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Burton DR, Hangartner L. Broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV and their role in vaccine design. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2016;34:635–659. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Steichen JM, et al. HIV vaccine design to target germline precursors of glycan-dependent broadly neutralizing antibodies. Immunity. 2016;45:483–496. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Duan H, et al. Glycan masking focuses immune responses to the HIV-1 CD4-binding site and enhances elicitation of VRC01-class precursor antibodies. Immunity. 2018;49:301–311.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Garrity RR, et al. Refocusing neutralizing antibody response by targeted dampening of an immunodominant epitope. J. Immunol. 1997;159:279–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Klasse PJ, et al. Epitopes for neutralizing antibodies induced by HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein BG505 SOSIP trimers in rabbits and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006913. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brune KD, et al. Plug-and-display: decoration of virus-like particles via isopeptide bonds for modular immunization. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:19234. doi: 10.1038/srep19234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zakeri B, et al. Peptide tag forming a rapid covalent bond to a protein, through engineering a bacterial adhesin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:E690–E697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115485109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Escolano, A. et al. Sequential immunization elicits broad, but weakly neutralizing, anti-HIV-1 antibodies to the viral envelope V3-glycan patch and CD4bs in rhesus macaques. Submitted (2021).
- 23.Vigdorovich V, et al. Repertoire comparison of the B-cell receptor-encoding loci in humans and rhesus macaques by next-generation sequencing. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2016;5:e93. doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang H, et al. Asymmetric recognition of HIV-1 Envelope trimer by V1V2 loop-targeting antibodies. Elife. 2017;6:e27389. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scharf L, et al. Antibody 8ANC195 reveals a site of broad vulnerability on the HIV-1 envelope spike. Cell Rep. 2014;7:785–795. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Scharf L, et al. Broadly neutralizing antibody 8ANC195 recognizes closed and open states of HIV-1 Env. Cell. 2015;162:1379–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sonn-Segev A, et al. Quantifying the heterogeneity of macromolecular machines by mass photometry. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1772. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15642-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scheid JF, et al. Sequence and structural convergence of broad and potent HIV antibodies that mimic CD4 binding. Science. 2011;333:1633–1637. doi: 10.1126/science.1207227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee JH, et al. Antibodies to a conformational epitope on gp41 neutralize HIV-1 by destabilizing the Env spike. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8167. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.West AP, Jr., et al. Computational analysis of anti-HIV-1 antibody neutralization panel data to identify potential functional epitope residues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:10598–10603. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309215110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gristick HB, et al. Natively glycosylated HIV-1 Env structure reveals new mode for antibody recognition of the CD4-binding site. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016;23:906–915. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schommers P, et al. Restriction of HIV-1 escape by a highly broad and potent neutralizing antibody. Cell. 2020;180:471–489 e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dubrovskaya V, et al. Targeted N-glycan deletion at the receptor-binding site retains HIV Env NFL trimer integrity and accelerates the elicited antibody response. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006614. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dubrovskaya V, et al. Vaccination with glycan-modified HIV NFL Envelope trimer-liposomes elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies to multiple sites of vulnerability. Immunity. 2019;51:915–929.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Turner HL, et al. Disassembly of HIV envelope glycoprotein trimer immunogens is driven by antibodies elicited via immunization. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:eabh2791. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abh2791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kumar S, et al. Capturing the inherent structural dynamics of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein fusion peptide. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:763. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08738-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu J, Bartesaghi A, Borgnia MJ, Sapiro G, Subramaniam S. Molecular architecture of native HIV-1 gp120 trimers. Nature. 2008;455:109–113. doi: 10.1038/nature07159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stadtmueller BM, et al. DEER spectroscopy measurements reveal multiple conformations of HIV-1 SOSIP Envelopes that show similarities with Envelopes on native virions. Immunity. 2018;49:235–246.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li Z, et al. Subnanometer structures of HIV-1 envelope trimers on aldrithiol-2-inactivated virus particles. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020;27:726–734. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0452-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Desrosiers RC, et al. Mapping the immunogenic landscape of near-native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates. PLOS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008753. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Berman HM, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang H, et al. Cryo-EM structure of a CD4-bound open HIV-1 envelope trimer reveals structural rearrangements of the gp120 V1V2 loop. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E7151–E7158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615939113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ozorowski G, et al. Open and closed structures reveal allostery and pliability in the HIV-1 envelope spike. Nature. 2017;547:360–363. doi: 10.1038/nature23010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang H, Barnes CO, Yang Z, Nussenzweig MC, Bjorkman PJ. Partially open HIV-1 Envelope structures exhibit conformational changes relevant for coreceptor binding and fusion. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24:579–592.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang Z, Wang H, Liu AZ, Gristick HB, Bjorkman PJ. Asymmetric opening of HIV-1 Env bound to CD4 and a coreceptor-mimicking antibody. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019;26:1167–1175. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0344-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang Z, et al. A broadly neutralizing macaque monoclonal antibody against the HIV-1 V3-Glycan patch. eLife. 2020;9:e61991. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Giudicelli V, Lefranc MP. IMGT/junctionanalysis: IMGT standardized analysis of the V-J and V-D-J junctions of the rearranged immunoglobulins (IG) and T cell receptors (TR) Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011;2011:716–725. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Giudicelli V, Brochet X, Lefranc MP. IMGT/V-QUEST: IMGT standardized analysis of the immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) nucleotide sequences. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011;2011:695–715. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brochet X, Lefranc MP, Giudicelli V. IMGT/V-QUEST: the highly customized and integrated system for IG and TR standardized V-J and V-D-J sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W503–W508. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kabat, E. A., Wu, T. T., Perry, H. M., Gottesman, K. S. & Foeller, C. Sequences of Proteins of Immunolgical Interest. (Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C., 1991).
- 51.Scharf L, et al. Structural basis for germline antibody recognition of HIV-1 immunogens. Elife. 2016;5:e13783. doi: 10.7554/eLife.13783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dey, A. K. et al. cGMP production and analysis of BG505 SOSIP.664, an extensively glycosylated, trimeric HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein vaccine candidate. Biotechnol. Bioeng.10.1002/bit.26498(2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Wyatt PJ. Light scattering and the absolute characterization of macromolecules. Analytica Chim. Acta. 1993;272:1–40. doi: 10.1016/0003-2670(93)80373-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mastronarde DN. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 2005;152:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Scheres SH. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 2012;180:519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zivanov J, et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife. 2018;7:e42166. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zheng SQ, et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:331–332. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 2016;193:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Scheres SH, Chen S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:853–854. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Goddard TD, Huang CC, Ferrin TE. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 2007;157:281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liebschner D, et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 2019;75:861–877. doi: 10.1107/S2059798319011471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Dunbar J, Deane CM. ANARCI: antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification. Bioinformatics. 2015;32:298–300. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Schrödinger, L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. 1.2r3pre edn (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 2011).
- 65.Montefiori, D. C. Evaluating neutralizing antibodies against HIV, SIV, and SHIV in luciferase reporter gene assays. Curr. Protoc. Immunol.Chapter 12, Unit 12 11 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 66.Huang J, et al. Identification of a CD4-binding-site antibody to HIV that evolved near-pan neutralization breadth. Immunity. 2016;45:1108–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The atomic model and cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession code 7MXE and Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) entry EMD-24072.