Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;22(11):1850–1857. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0140

Table 4. Subjective Image Quality Analysis.

CT* Difference of Mean Scores
50 mAs (A) Denoised 50 mAs (B) 100 mAs (C) |(A)−(B)| |(A)−(C)| |(B)−(C)|
Overall image quality 1.95 ± 0.37 3.71 ± 0.32 2.80 ± 0.33 1.76 0.85 0.91
Visibility of anatomical structures
Vertebral body 2.51 ± 0.55 3.82 ± 0.28 3.21 ± 0.52 1.31 0.70 0.61
Transverse and spinous processes 2.49 ± 0.62 3.70 ± 0.37 3.24 ± 0.46 1.21 0.75 0.46
Facet joint 2.72 ± 0.64 3.54 ± 0.49 3.47 ± 0.54 0.82 0.75 0.07
Dural sac 1.29 ± 0.35 2.62 ± 0.80 1.90 ± 0.59 1.33 0.61 0.72
Ligamentum flavum 1.43 ± 0.50 2.85 ± 0.68 2.23 ± 0.60 1.42 0.8 0.62
Psoas muscle 1.67 ± 0.44 3.62 ± 0.46 2.64 ± 0.53 1.95 0.97 0.98
Paraspinal muscle 1.70 ± 0.49 3.35 ± 0.53 2.63 ± 0.58 1.65 0.93 0.72

*Data are mean ± standard deviation of the average score of the two reviewers, Scores were significantly different in all comparisons except for facet joint visualization between (B) and (C).