Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 23;10:303. Originally published 2021 Apr 19. [Version 3] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52086.3

Table 3. Comparison of anti-vinculin and anti-CdtB between different subgroups of IBS and control subjects.

Parameter IBS-C
(N = 40)
(Mean ± SD) 		IBS-D
(N = 26)
(Mean ± SD) 		IBS-M
(N = 34)
(Mean ± SD) 		Control
(N = 100)
(Mean ± SD) 		P
Anti-vinculin 1.33 ± 0.49 1.84 ± 0.42 1.68 ± 0.42 1.13 ± 0.25 P1 = 0.001
P2 = 0.001
P3 = 0.001
P4 = 0.01
P5 = 0.001
P6 = 0.001
Anti-CdtB 2.52 ± 0.46 2.98 ± 0.6 2.03 ± 0.67 2.1 ± 0.24 P = 0.001
P1 = 0.001
P2 = 0.001
P3 = 0.001
P4 = 0.2
P5 = 0.001
P6 = 0.001
  • .

    P1 comparing IBS-C and IBS-D.

  • .

    P2 comparing IBS-C and IBS-M.

  • .

    P3 comparing IBS-D and IBS-M.

  • .

    P4 comparing IBS-M and control subjects.

  • .

    P5 comparing IBS-IBS-C and control subjects.

  • .

    P6 comparing IBS-D and control subjects.