Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2021 Sep 7;12(5):e01599-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01599-21

Immunological Profiling of COVID-19 Patients with Pulmonary Sequelae

Jianghua Wu a,b,#, Lu Tang a,b,#, Yanling Ma c,#, Yu Li c,#, Dongmei Zhang c, Qian Li a,b, Heng Mei a,b,, Yu Hu a,b,
Editors: Jose Luis Villarreal-Camachod, Avery Auguste
PMCID: PMC8546863  PMID: 34488453

ABSTRACT

Cellular immunity may be involved in organ damage and rehabilitation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to delineate immunological features of COVID-19 patients with pulmonary sequelae (PS) 1 year after discharge. Fifty COVID-19 survivors were recruited and classified according to radiological characteristics, including 24 patients with PS and 26 patients without PS. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of immune cells were evaluated by multiparametric flow cytometry. Patients with PS had an increased proportion of natural killer (NK) cells and a lower percentage of B cells than patients without PS. Phenotypic and functional features of T cells in patients with PS were predominated by the accumulation of CD4-positive (CD4+) T cells secreting interleukin 17A (IL-17A), short-lived effector-like CD8+ T cells (CD27-negative [CD27] CD62L), and senescent T cells with excessive secretion of granzyme B/perforin/interferon gamma (IFN-γ). NK cells were characterized by the excessive secretion of granzyme B and perforin and the downregulation of NKP30 and NKP46; highly activated NKT and γδ T cells exhibited NKP30 and TIM-3 upregulation and NKB1 downregulation in patients with PS. However, immunosuppressive cells were comparable between the two groups. The interrelationship of immune cells in COVID-19 was intrinsically identified, whereby T cells secreting IL-2, IL-4, and IL-17A were enriched among CD28+ and CD57 cells and cells secreting perforin/granzyme B/IFN-γ/tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)-expressed markers of terminal differentiation. CD57+ NK cells, CD4+Perforin+ T cells, and CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ T cells were identified as the independent predictors for residual lesions. Overall, our findings unveil the profound imbalance of immune landscape that may correlate with organ damage and rehabilitation in COVID-19.

KEYWORDS: COVID-19, cellular immunity, pulmonary sequelae

INTRODUCTION

As of early May 2021, more than 150 million people have developed coronavirus disease (COVID-19), a pandemic that has killed approximately 3 million people. Caused by acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), COVID-19 exhibits a highly variable clinical course, ranging from a high proportion of asymptomatic and mild infections to severe and fatal disease (1). With the help of interventions and immediate medical support, most patients have recovered. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of survivors have unresolved health issues, such as pulmonary fibrosis and gas diffusion impairment (2). Thus, understanding the clinical and immunological features of convalescent individuals is critically important to elucidate the immunopathogenesis of COVID-19 and facilitate the development of effective immune interventions.

Early infection with SARS-CoV-2 can induce efficient innate immunity, followed by an adaptive immune response to control the virus (3). Such synchronized interaction between innate and adaptive immunity exquisitely mediates both viral control and host toxicity in COVID-19. Although activated immune cells orchestrate a protective function against SARS-CoV-2, they also participate in tissue damage if overactivated by inflammatory stimuli (4). Numerous studies have investigated humoral and cellular immune responses in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 (57). For example, peripheral blood SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells are detectable in convalescent patients, especially SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8-positive (CD8+) and CD4+ T cells, which correlated not only with serum-neutralizing activities but also with disease severity (711). One study detected both virus-specific memory B and T cells in individuals who have recovered from mildly symptomatic COVID-19, showing that these cells not only persist but, in some cases, increased numerically over 3 months after symptom onset (5). However, it remains unclear how cellular immunity mediates long-term protective and pathogenic inflammation in COVID-19.

Similar to influenza virus infection (12), SARS-CoV-2-mediated lung damage entails the interplay among aberrantly activated monocytes/macrophages producing interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), inflammation-induced impairment of alveolar epithelial regeneration, and expansion of CTHRC1+ pathological fibroblasts that promoted fibrosis and may impair regeneration (13). Zhao et al. identified clonally expanded tissue-resident Th17 cells in the lungs of patients even after SARS-CoV-2 clearance, which may interact with profibrotic macrophages and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, leading to the formation of pulmonary fibrosis (4). Although lung lesions in COVID-19 patients could be completely absorbed during follow-up with no sequelae, residual ground-glass opacification, interstitial thickening, or fibrotic-like changes were observed in most patients who survived severe COVID-19 (2, 14, 15). Immunologic determinants underlying pulmonary sequelae (PS) are not fully understood in COVID-19. To determine the immunopathogenesis of PS, we recruited 24 COVID-19 survivors with PS and 26 patients without PS and performed comprehensive assessments of immunological profiling. Our study highlights the profound imbalance of immune landscape in COVID-19 patients with PS, as characterized by robust activation of cytotoxic T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and γδ T cells, as well as deficiencies in immunosuppressive cells.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of convalescent patients with COVID-19.

A total of 50 convalescent patients with COVID-19 were included and categorized as 24 patients with PS (PPSs) and 26 patients without PS (NPSs) based on radiological characteristics. As shown in Table 1, the mean age of all patients was 53.96 years, with a significantly older age for PPSs than NPSs (59.63 versus 48.73; P < 0.0003). The most common comorbidities among the patients were 20.00% with hypertension, 14.00% with diabetes mellitus, and 10.00% with cardiopathy. Nasopharyngeal swab SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was negative in all patients 1 year after discharge (Table 1). SARS-CoV-2 IgM (2 patients; 8.33%) and IgG levels (22; 91.67%) in PPSs were positive, while SARS-CoV-2 IgM (2; 7.69%) and IgG levels (23; 88.46%) in NPSs were positive (Table 1). The predominant patterns of PS were ground-glass opacity (24; 100.00%), fiber streak shadow (21, 87.50%), and tractive bronchiectasis (8, 33.33%) in PPSs (Table 1). Representative chest computed tomography (CT) scans longitudinally exhibited the change of lung lesions (Fig. 1A). Although the lung lesions gradually resolved in all patients, ground-glass opacity, (GGO), fiber streak shadow, tractive bronchiectasis, reticulation, and bronchovascular bundle distortion could be observed in the representative patients (Fig. 1A to C). Importantly, there was a statistically significant increment in hemoglobin in PPSs in comparison to NPSs (Table 1), suggesting that residual pulmonary lesions may influence diffusion capacity and induce a compensatory increase in hemoglobin in those with PS.

TABLE 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patientsa

Characteristic Data for:
P value
All patients (n = 50) Patients with PS (n = 24) Patients without PS (n = 26)
Gender (no. [%]) 0.0438
    Female 29 (58.00) 10 (41.67) 19 (73.1)
    Male 21 (42.00) 14 (58.33) 7 (26.9)
Age (yrs [mean ± SD]) 53.96 ± 11.10 59.63 ± 10.43 48.73 ± 9.07 0.0003
SARS-CoV2 PCR test result (no. [%])
    Negative 50 (100.00) 24 (100.00) 26 (100.00) >0.9999
IgM/IgG antibody result (no. [%])
    IgM positive 4 (8.00) 2 (8.33) 2 (7.69) >0.9999
    IgG positive 45 (90.00) 22 (91.67) 23 (88.46) >0.9999
Past medical history (no. [%])
    Hypertension 10 (20.00) 7 (29.17) 3 (11.5) 0.1642
    Diabetes mellitus 7 (14.00) 6 (25.00) 1 (3.85) 0.0451
    Cardiopathy 5 (10.00) 3 (12.50) 2 (7.7) 0.6613
CT findings (no. [%])
    Ground-glass opacity 24 (100.00)
    Fiber streak shadow 21 (87.50)
    Tractive bronchiectasis 8 (33.33)
    Reticulation 7 (29.17)
    Bronchovascular bundle distortion 5 (20.83)
Laboratory finding (mean ± SD)
    White blood cell 5.71 ± 1.54 6.28 ± 1.57 5.17 ± 1.33 0.0097
    Neutrophil 3.65 ± 1.31 3.87 ± 1.30 3.44 ± 1.30 0.2515
    Lymphocyte 1.89 ± 0.72 2.15 ± 0.87 1.65 ± 0.43 0.0125
    Monocyte 0.36 ± 0.11 0.38 ± 0.08 0.35 ± 0.14 0.2996
    Platelet 219.50 ± 58.17 217.40 ± 66.51 221.50 ± 50.53 0.8051
    Hemoglobin 145.20 ± 13.77 151.00 ± 13.52 139.80 ± 11.84 0.0030
a

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and no. (%) of patients with available data. P values comparing patients with PS and patients without PS are from Fisher’s exact test or unpaired 2-sided Student's t test. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; CT, computed tomography; PS, pulmonary sequelae.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Chest computed tomography scan of four patients across three time periods, including on admission, end of hospitalization, and 1 year after discharge. (A to D) Chest CT of three time periods showed the change of lung lesions from 3 patients with pulmonary sequelae (P1, P2, and P3) and 1 patient without pulmonary sequelae (P4). (A) CT image of a 61-year-old man (P1) showing ground-glass opacity (GGO), fiber streak shadow, and reticulation 1 year after discharge. (B) CT image of a 77-year-old man (P2) showing GGO, fiber streak shadow, and bronchovascular bundle distortion 1 year after discharge. (C) CT image of a 58-year-old man (P3) showing GGO, fiber streak shadow, and tractive bronchiectasis 1 year after discharge. (D) CT image of a 36-year-old woman (P4) showing complete resolution of lung lesions 1 year after discharge.

NK cells and short-lived effector-like CD8+ T cells accumulate in PPSs.

Immunologic disturbance induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by lymphopenia in those with acute COVID-19 (16). Strikingly, white blood cell and lymphocyte counts were higher in PPSs than NPSs 1 year after discharge, whereas no significant differences in neutrophil, monocyte, and platelet counts were found between the two groups (Table 1). We next analyzed the presence of lymphocyte subsets to obtain an overview of the general distribution in the peripheral blood. The NK cell percentage was significantly higher in PPSs than in NPSs, but there were no significant differences in CD3+ T, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NKT, and γδ T cell percentages (Fig. 2A). A decreased proportion of B cells was detected in PSSs, though the memory B cell frequency was not significantly different (Fig. 2A and B).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Lymphocyte composition and immunophenotypic characterization of B and T cells in convalescent COVID-19 patients. Circulating lymphocytes from COVID-19 patients with pulmonary sequelae (PPSs; n = 24) and patients without pulmonary sequelae (NPSs; n = 26) were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry. (A) Relative proportions of CD3+ T, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, γδ T, and B cells between the two groups. (B) Relative proportions of memory and naive B cells between the two groups. (C) Relative proportions of CD4/CD8+ CD27 CD62, CD4/CD8+ CD27+ CD62, CD4/CD8+ CD27+ CD62+, and CD4/CD8+ CD27 CD62+ T cells between the two groups. (D) Relative proportions of CD4/CD8+ CD28+, CD4/CD8+ CD57+, CD4/CD8+ KLRG1+, CD4/CD8+ PD-1+ T cells, and CD4/CD8+ TIM-3+ T cells between the two groups. Data are mean ± SD. The Mann-Whitney U test or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to compare the two groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

We next performed immunophenotypic analyses of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to identify their state of differentiation, exhaustion, and senescence. CD27 and CD62L were used to distinguish maturation and memory subsets in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. We found no significant differences in CD4+ T cell populations based on CD27 and CD62L expression between PPSs and NPSs (Fig. 2C). CD27-negative (CD27) CD62L T cells represent short-lived effector-like T cells characterized by the enrichment for antigen-experienced and senescent T cells, while CD27+ CD62L+ T cells consist of naive T cells and central memory T cells (17). Importantly, there was a statistically significant increase in the CD8+ CD27 CD62L T cells percentage in PPSs, yet the CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ T cell frequency was significantly reduced (Fig. 2C). CD4+ CD57+ T cells percentage tended to be higher in PPSs than in NPSs, though there was no statistical difference (Fig. 2D). A higher percentage of CD8+ CD57+ T cells was observed in PPSs (Fig. 2D). Moreover, increases of both CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells expressing KLRG-1 and TIM-3 were detected in PPSs, with no changes in the frequencies of CD28- and PD-1-expressing T cells between PPSs and NPSs (Fig. 2D).

Circulating NK cells and innate-like lymphocytes exhibit distinct phenotypes between PPSs and NPSs.

NK, NKT, and γδ T cells, large granular lymphocytes with the ability to lyse virally infected cells, are important components of antiviral immunity (1820). Having established that PPSs displayed an increase in the NK cells percentage, we further analyzed the NK cell phenotype. Importantly, there was a statistically significant increment in NK cells expressing CD57, whereas the frequencies of NKP30- and NKP46-expressing NK cells were significantly reduced in PPSs (Fig. 3A). No changes in the frequencies of CD27-, KLRG1-, PD-1-, TIM-3-, NKB1-, NKG2A-, and NKG2D-expressing NK cells were noted between the two groups (Fig. 3A). Focusing on NKT cells, we observed an increase in the fraction of those expressing TIM-3 and NKP30, but the fraction of NKB1+ NKT cells was markedly decreased in PPSs (Fig. 3B), suggesting that NKT cells exhibit an activated or exhausted state. However, there were no significant differences in the frequencies of CD27-, CD57-, KLRG1-, PD-1-, NKG2A-, NKG2D- and NKP46-expressing NKT cells between the two groups (Fig. 3B). Moreover, γδ T cells from PPSs overexpressed CD57, KLRG1, TIM-3, and NKP30 (Fig. 3C), which is compatible with a senescent, hyperactivated exhaustion profile. Downregulation of the inhibitory receptor NKB1 and CD27 in γδ T cells was found in PPSs, but PD-1, NKG2A, and NKP46 expressions were unaffected (Fig. 3C).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Phenotypical features of NK, NKT, and γδ T cells in convalescent COVID-19 patients. Circulating NK, NKT, and γδ T cells from COVID-19 patients with pulmonary sequelae (PPSs; n = 24) and patients without pulmonary sequelae (NPSs; n = 26) were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry. (A) Relative proportions of CD27, CD57, KLRG1, PD-1, TIM-3, NKB1, NKG2A, NKG2D, NKP30, and NKP46 expression on NK cells between the two groups. (B) Relative proportions of CD27, CD57, KLRG1, PD-1, TIM-3, NKB1, NKG2A, NKG2D, NKP30, and NKP46 expression on NKT cells between the two groups. (C) Relative proportions of CD27, CD57, KLRG1, PD-1, TIM-3, NKB1, NKG2A, NKG2D, NKP30, and NKP46 expression on γδ T cells between the two groups. Data are mean ± SD. Mann-Whitney U test or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to compare the two groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Coexistence of senescence and exhaustion phenotypic signatures in cytokine-secreting cells in PPSs.

We next assessed cytokine production in CD3+ T cells after stimulation with PMA and ionomycin and observed that, in comparison to NPSs, CD4+ T cells from PPSs overexpressed IL-17A and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) but not IL-2, IL-4, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (Fig. 4A). The frequency of IFN-γ expression was higher among CD8+ T cells in PPSs than NPSs, with no significant differences in IL-4, IL-17A, and TNF-α production in CD8+ T cells between the two groups (Fig. 4B). Nonetheless, CD8+ T cells from PPSs showed downregulated IL-2 expression compared with NPSs (Fig. 4B). We next investigated the degranulation capacity and cytotoxic molecule expression in CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells. Based on functional characterization, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, and γδ T cells exhibited upregulation of granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin in PPSs compared with NPSs (Fig. 4C and D). However, no significant differences in GZMB and perforin expression in NKT cells were observed (Fig. 4C and D).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Functional characterization of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells. Circulating CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells from COVID-19 patients with pulmonary sequelae (PPSs; n = 24) and patients without pulmonary sequelae (NPSs; n = 26) were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry. (A) Relative proportions of CD4+ IL-2+, CD4+ IL-4+, CD4+ IL-17A+, CD4+ IFN-γ+, and CD4+ TNF-α+ T cells between the two groups. (B) Relative proportions of CD8+ IL-2+, CD8+ IL-4+, CD8+ IL-17A+, CD8+ IFN-γ+, and CD8+ TNF-α+ T cells between the two groups. (C) Relative proportions of perforin in circulating CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells between the two groups. (D) Relative proportions of GZMB in circulating CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells between the two groups. Data are mean ± SD. The Mann-Whitney U test or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to compare the two groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

We next used a clustering and visualization strategy to investigate the coexpression of CD27, CD28, PD-1, and CD57, together with cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IFN-γ) and cytotoxic molecules (GZMB and perforin) (Fig. 5A and B and Fig. S1H to I in the supplemental material). The advantage of this analysis lies in its integration of surface and functional markers at a single-cell level, providing an improved understanding of their high-dimensional relationship. CD4+ IL-2+, CD4+ IL-4+, and CD4+ IL-17A+ T cells hardly expressed CD57 (Fig. 5A). Phenotypic characterization further demonstrated that CD4+ T cells expressing IL-2, IL-4, and IL-17A were prominent among the CD28+ T cells (Fig. 5A). According to a representative scatterplot, IFN-γ could be secreted by CD4+ CD57+ T cells and CD4+ CD57 T cells; furthermore, CD4+ CD57+ IFN-γ+ T cells were enriched among CD4+ CD28 T cells (Fig. 5A). As observed in CD4+ T cells, the coexpression of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-17A, together with CD28 and CD57, could be similarly observed in CD8+ T cells (Fig. S1H). Next, we investigated whether PD-1 expression correlates with cytokine production in the T cell population. We found that IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression was mainly distributed in PD-1 T cells (Fig. 5A and Fig. S1H). We summarized these data in a heatmap and exhibited the distributions of IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression together with CD28, CD57, and PD-1 between the two groups (Fig. 5C).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Senescence and exhaustion phenotypes coexist in cytokine-secreting CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells. The coexpression of CD27, CD28, and PD-1, together with cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IFN-γ), in CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells from COVID-19 patients with pulmonary sequelae (PPSs; n = 24) and patients without pulmonary sequelae (NPSs; n = 26) was analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry. (A) Bidimensional map obtained from flow cytometric data displaying the coexpression of CD27, CD28, and PD-1, together with cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IFN-γ), in CD4+ T cell. Figure S1H in the supplemental material displays the coexpression of CD27, CD28, and PD-1, together with cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IFN-γ), in CD8+ T cell. The coexpression of CD27, CD28, and 57, together with granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin, in circulating CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells from COVID-19 PPSs (n = 24) and NPSs (n = 26) was analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry. (B) Bidimensional map obtained from flow cytometric data displaying the coexpression of CD28 and CD57, together with GZMB and perforin, in CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells. Figure S1I displays the coexpression of CD27 and CD57, together with GZMB and perforin, in CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells. (C) Heatmap represents the percentage of cells in CD27+, CD27, CD28+, CD28, PD-1+, and PD-1- clusters that express IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IFN-γ in CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells for PPSs and NPSs. (D) Heatmap represents the percentage of cells in CD27+, CD27, CD28+, CD28, CD57+, and CD57 clusters that express GZMB and perforin in CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells for PSSs and NPSs.

FIG S1

Gating strategy. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.7 MB (693.4KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2021 Wu et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We next investigated the expression of CD27, CD28, and CD57 together with cytotoxic molecules in CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells (Fig. 5B). According to the representative scatterplot, GZMB and perforin expression was higher among CD4+ CD57+ T cells than CD4+ CD57 T cells in both groups; furthermore, CD4+ CD57+ GZMB+ T cells and CD4+ CD57+ perforin-positive T cells were mainly enriched among CD27 cells and CD28 cells (Fig. 5B and Fig. S1I). As observed in CD4+ T cells, GZMB and perforin expression in CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells was similarly enriched among CD57+ cells, CD28 cells, and CD27 cells (Fig. 5B and Fig. S1I). We summarized the data in a heatmap and exhibited the distributions of GZMB and perforin expressions together with CD27, CD28, and CD57 between the two groups (Fig. 5D).

Comparable immunosuppressive cells between PPSs and NPSs.

Immunosuppressive cells served as the main mechanisms for maintaining immune homeostasis. However, there is considerable controversy regarding whether immunosuppressive cells promote or constrain the formation of fibrosis induced by pathogenic T cells (2124). We next explored the distribution of immunosuppressive cells in recovered patients. After lysis of the erythrocytes, we directly used cell surface markers to stain monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs; HLA-DR/low CD33+ CD11b+ CD14+), granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs; HLA-DR/low CD33+ CD11b+ CD14 CD15+), regulatory T cells (Tregs; CD4+ CD127/low CD25+), and regulatory B cells (Bregs; CD19+ CD24+ CD38+) (25, 26). Certainly, it is not stringent to define G-MDSCs by using this method. Patients with acute COVID-19 produce emergency myelopoiesis-generating immunosuppressive myeloid cells (27). But M-MDSC and G-MDSC frequencies did not differ between PPSs and NPSs (Fig. 6A and B). A decrease in HLA-DR on monocytes in acute COVID-19 is associated with severe respiratory failure (28). We did not observe any significant difference in HLA-DR expression on monocyte between the two groups 1 year after discharge (data not shown). Additionally, Tregs and Bregs showed no significant differences among the groups (Fig. 6C and D). Together, our data indicate that immunosuppressive cells may be insufficient to constrain the robust activation of a variety of immune cells in PPSs.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Distribution of immunosuppressive cells between patients with PS and patients without PS. Circulating G-MDSCs, M-MDSCs, Tregs, and Bregs from COVID-19 patients with pulmonary sequelae (PPSs; n = 24) and patients without pulmonary sequelae (NPSs; n = 26) were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry. (A) Relative proportions of G-MDSCs between the two groups. (B) Relative proportions of M-MDSCs between the two groups. (C) Relative proportions of Tregs frequencies between the two groups. (D) Relative proportions of Bregs between the two groups. Data are mean ± SD. The Mann-Whitney U test or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to compare the two groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

The interrelationship of immune cells and its association with clinical features in COVID-19.

Having established that senescent signatures coexist within cytotoxic molecule-secreting cells, we further investigated the interrelationship of immune cells in convalescent patients with COVID-19 (Fig. 7A). Correlation analysis verified that T cells secreting cytotoxic molecules correlated negatively with CD27+ CD62L+ T cells and CD28+ T cells but positively with short-lived effector-like CD27 CD62L T cells, CD57+ T cells, and KLRG1+ T cells (Fig. 7A). CD57 and KLRG-1 are thought to be associated with T cell senescence and also serve as a marker of cytotoxic function (29). Importantly, IL-2 expression within CD8+ T cells correlated negatively with CD8+ CD27 CD62L T cells, CD8+ CD57+ T cells, CD8+Perforin+ T cells, and CD8+ GZBM+ T cells (Fig. 7A). The downregulated IL-2 expression in CD8+ T cells from PPSs further verifies that these patients retained large amounts of short-lived like CD8+ T cells that abundantly secrete cytotoxic molecules. Moreover, the expression of perforin and GZMB within NK cells was also positively associated with effector molecule CD57 but inversely with PD-1, NKP30, and NKP46 expression (Fig. 7A). Additionally, GZMB and perforin expression exhibited intrinsic positive correlations among CD4+ T, CD8+ T, NK, NKT, and γδ T cells, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection may simultaneously trigger robust activation of a variety of immune cells. More detailed information is displayed in the correlation heatmap depicted in Fig. 7A.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Interrelationship of immune cells and its correlation with clinical features. (A) Correlation heatmap exhibiting the interrelationship of immune cells in all recruited patients with COVID-19. (B) Correlation heatmap exhibiting the correlation of immunological parameters with age and disease type (two types, patients with pulmonary sequelae and patients without pulmonary sequelae). Spearman’s rank coefficient was used to determine correlations between two variables. The three most contributing variables (CD8+ CD27+ CD62+ T cells, CD57+ NK cells, and CD4+Perforin+ T cells) were identified by multivariate logistic regression analyses. (C to F) ROC curves were calculated for these selected parameters by using SPSS.

We next sought to determine whether the phenotypic and functional features of immune cells correlate with age and disease type in COVID-19. Correlation analysis suggested that age significantly influenced the phenotypic and functional features of immune cells (Fig. 7B). Senescent and short-lived, such as CD8+ T cells, CD8+ T cells secreting perforin/granzyme B/IFN-γ, NK cells secreting perforin/granzyme B, NKP30+ NKT, TIM-3+ NKT, NKP30+ γδ T, KLRG1+ γδ T, and CD57+ γδ T cell percentages correlated positively with age, whereas B cells, CD3+ T cells, NKT cells, CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ T cells, NKB1+ γδ T cells, NKG2D+ γδ T cells, CD27+ NK cells, NKG2D+ NK cells, and NKG2D+ NKT cell frequencies correlated negatively with age (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, correlation analysis of immunological parameters in PPSs and NPSs revealed that senescent, exhausted GZMB- and perforin-secreting immune cells correlated positively with PS (Fig. 7B). Additionally, CD8+ CD27 CD62L T cell, NK cells, M-MDSCs, NKP30+ γδ T cell, NKP30+ NKT cell, CD4+ IFN-γ+, and CD8+ IFN-γ+ T cell percentages correlated positively with PS (Fig. 7B).

Next, we examined the possibility of using the above-mentioned parameters as prognostic factors for identifying determinants for residual lesions in COVID-19 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ T cells (odds ratio [OR], 0.738; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.590 to 0.924; P = 0.008), CD57+ NK cells (OR, 1.181; 95% CI, 1.038 to 1.343; P = 0.012), and CD4+perforin-positive T cells (OR, 1.153; 95% CI, 0.953 to 1.396; P = 0.143) as independent predictors for residual lung lesions (Table 2). Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was carried out to assess the capacity of the three cell populations to differentiate disease type (PPSs and NPSs). The cutoff values (sensitivity and specificity) are as follows: CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ T cells, 26.045% (0.885% and 0.708%); CD57+ NK cells, 74.095% (0.708% and 0.885%); and CD4+Perforin+ T cells, 3.245% (0.875% and 0.423%). The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) value of the combination of the three cells (CD57+ NK cells, CD4+Perforin+ T cells, and CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ T cells) was highest (0.942) (Fig. 7C to F).

TABLE 2.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of PS

Age or cell type Data for univariate logistic regression
Data for multivariate logistic regression
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Age 1.117 1.043–1.197 0.002
B cell 0.590 0.435–0.802 0.001
CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ 0.834 0.754–0.922 <0.001 0.738 0.590–0.924 0.008
CD8+ CD27 CD62L 1.083 1.031–1.138 0.001
NK 1.090 1.012–1.174 0.023
CD4+ KLRG1+ 1.082 1.016–1.153 0.015
CD4+ TIM-3+ 1.082 1.010–1.158 0.024
CD8+ CD57+ 1.114 1.047–1.185 0.001
CD8+ KLRG1+ 1.122 1.051–1.198 0.001
CD8+ TIM-3+ 1.186 1.055–1.332 0.004
NK+ CD57+ 1.096 1.033–1.164 0.003 1.181 1.038–1.343 0.012
NKT+ TIM-3+ 1.155 1.043–1.279 0.005
CD57+ γδT 1.105 1.043–1.171 0.001
KLRG1+ γδT 1.098 1.034–1.165 0.002
TIM-3+ γδT 1.196 1.036–1.381 0.014
NK+ NKP30+ 0.953 0.912–0.996 0.031
NK+ NKP46+ 0.930 0.877–0.987 0.017
NKT+ NKB1+ 0.939 0.900–0.979 0.003
NKB1+ γδT 0.920 0.878–0.965 0.001
NKP30+ γδT 1.049 1.011–1.087 0.010
CD4+ IFN+ 1.151 1.038–1.276 0.008
CD4+ IL-17A+ 1.550 1.046–2.296 0.029
CD8+ IFN+ 1.133 1.057–1.215 <0.001
CD4+ GZMB+ 1.118 1.016–1.230 0.022
CD4+Perforin+ 1.112 1.009–1.226 0.033 1.153 0.953–1.396 0.143
CD8+ GZMB+ 1.089 1.038–1.142 <0.001
CD8+Perforin+ 1.083 1.033–1.135 0.001
NK+ GZMB+ 1.113 1.040–1.192 0.002
NK+Perforin+ 1.304 1.128–1.507 <0.001
GZMB+ γδT 1.054 1.012–1.097 0.012
Perforin+γδT 1.067 1.018–1.118 0.007
CD27+ γδT 0.938 0.896–0.982 0.006

DISCUSSION

Although a tremendous global effort by the scientific community has greatly improved our understanding of COVID-19, the immunopathogenesis of PS remains to be elucidated. Here, we describe the circulating immune landscape of COVID-19 patients with PS compared with those without PS. Residual lesions in PPSs were mainly GGO and fiber streak shadow. Our study demonstrates that there existed significantly divergent immunological characteristics between PPSs and NPSs 1 year after discharge. Immunological signatures in PPSs were predominated by the accumulation of CD4+ T cells secreting IL-17A and short-lived effector-like CD8+ T cells with excessive secretion of IFN-γ/granzyme B/perforin. NK cells were characterized by excessive secretion of granzyme B and perforin and downregulation of NKP30 and NKP46; NKT and γδ T cells demonstrated highly activated and exhausted states in PPSs. Overall, we observed robust activation of a variety of immune cells in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and specific features unique to COVID-19 with PS and hyperinflammation, providing a base for understanding the role of cellular immunity in patients with COVID-19.

Over 80% of patients with COVID-19 experience lymphopenia and exhibit drastically reduced numbers of various lymphocyte subsets, including CD4+ T, CD8+ T, B, γδ T, and NK cells, especially in the peripheral blood of those with severe COVID-19 during the acute phase (16, 3034). Early-stage lymphopenia is thought to correlate with lymphocyte chemotaxis in COVID-19 (35, 36). To our surprise, lymphocyte counts were higher in PPSs than in NPSs 1 year after discharge, suggesting that lymphocytes may exit inflamed tissues and undergo clonal expansion after the resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In general, clonal expansion of both innate and adaptive lymphocytes is a critical process for host defense via amplification of lymphocytes specific to the invading pathogen. The NK cell percentage was significantly higher in PPSs than in NPSs, whereas the B cell frequency was lower in the former, suggesting that NK cells underwent more significant clonal expansion. A previous study found that decreased B cells were associated with prolonged viral RNA shedding from the respiratory tract in COVID-19 (37). Nevertheless, the reason for the obvious expansion of NK cells following SARS-CoV-2 clearance in PPSs remains to be elucidated. Prolonged viral RNA shedding may induce clonal expansion of NK cells in an antigen-specific manner, similar to the response to cytomegalovirus infection of acquiring memory features (38). Since reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues (39), there might also be latent SARSCoV-2 virus in the reservoir cells in PPSs that could lead to the prolonged expansion of NK cells.

Excessive activation of proinflammatory immune cells can lead to enhanced inflammation and injury during pulmonary viral infection (40). COVID-19 promotes cell polarization of naive and memory cells to effector, cytotoxic, exhausted, and regulatory cells, along with increased late NK cells, and induces gene expression related to inflammation and cellular senescence (41). By examining the phenotypic characteristics of T cells, we observed a low percentage of CD8+ CD27+ CD62L+ T cells but a high level of CD8+ CD27 CD62L T cells in PSSs. T cells in PSSs displayed an overall exhausted and senescent phenotype, with overexpression of CD57, KLRG-1, and TIM-3. Functional analysis further revealed that upregulation of degranulation capacity and cytotoxic molecules in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in PPSs compared with NPSs. Our findings are in line with published papers (4244). SARS-CoV-2 infection may induce a cytotoxic response, characterized by simultaneous production of GZMB and perforin in T cells, NK cells, and γδ T cells in PPSs. Excessive activation of cytotoxic T, NK, and γδ T cells is not protective but, rather, drives pulmonary damage after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Emerging evidence suggests that COVID-19 survivors have impaired lung function, with the development of pulmonary fibrosis (2, 14). Tissue-resident CD8+ T cells drive age-associated chronic lung sequelae after viral pneumonia (45). Also, clonally expanded tissue-resident memory-like Th17 cells may interact with profibrotic macrophages and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, leading to the formation of pulmonary fibrosis (4). We observed that peripheral blood CD4+ T cells overexpressed IL-17A/IFN-γ and that CD8+ T cells overexpressed IFN-γ/GZMB/perforin in PSSs. CD103high Tregs can constrain lung fibrosis induced by CD103low tissue-resident pathogenic CD4+ T cells with higher production of effector cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17A, and IFN-γ (23). However, immunosuppressive cells were comparable between PPSs and NPSs in our study, indicating that these cells may be insufficient to constrain the robust activation of a variety of immune cells in PSSs. Considering that Tregs are equally important to prevent inflammation-induced tissue damage during acute infections and to promote tissue repair, the scholars suggest that Tregs-based strategies could be considered for COVID-19 patient management (46). Hence, immune intervention may be one of the effective treatment measures to reduce the occurrence of PS after the resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Several other important findings emerged from our data. First, IL-2+ T cells, IL-4+ T cells, and IL-17A+ T cells hardly expressed CD57 but were enriched among CD28+ cells, indicating that autocrine cytokines may provide a tonic signal that inhibits senescence. Furthermore, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, NKT cells, and γδ T cells secreting GZMB and perforin were enriched among CD57+ cells, CD28 cells, and CD27 cells. Although peripheral blood CD57+ T cells exhibit phenotypic and functional features of terminally differentiated effector cells, these cells display enhanced cytotoxic function (4749). Moreover, GZMB and perforin expression exhibited intrinsic positive correlations among CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, NKT cells, and γδ T cells, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection may simultaneously activate a variety of immune cells. In addition, we also noted downregulated expression of NKP30 and NKP46 in NK cells despite excessive secretion of perforin and GZMB in PPSs. Combined with previous research showing reduced surface expression of NKP30 and NKP46 on adaptive memory NK cells (50), downregulated expression of NKP30 and NKP46 may act as a protective mechanism against tissue damage induced by excessive secretion of perforin and GZMB. Certainly, SARS-CoV-2 may escape the killing of NK cells and damage lung tissue due to downregulated expression of NKP30 and NKP46.

Although our study confirms some findings and provides new data on the innate and adaptive immune landscape of patients with PS who have recovered from COVID-19 1 year after discharge, we recognize limitations that might be overcome with larger sample sizes and matched control populations. Furthermore, there is a lack of understanding of the phenotype and function of immune cells from the lungs, which may directly participate in the formation of PS. Hence, the hierarchy of immunodominant circulating blood immune cells may not exactly reflect immunophenotypic features in the lungs. In summary, our study first shows significant differences in immunological characteristics between PPSs and NPSs 1 year after discharge. Although the detailed mechanisms by which cellular immunity participates in the development of PS remain to be investigated, our in-depth analysis of immunological profiling contributes to our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of COVID-19, facilitating the tailoring of more effective and proactive therapies for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and participants.

In order to determine the immunopathogenesis of residual lung lesions in COVID-19 survivors 1 year after discharge, a total of 50 convalescent patients were recruited at union hospitals. At the visit, routine blood test, chest computed tomography (CT) scans, and nucleic acid test and antibody detection for SARS-CoV-2 were performed for each participant. The patients were classified as 24 PPSs and 26 NPSs according to radiological characteristics. Patients who reached complete radiological resolution were regarded as NPSs. Complete radiological resolution was defined as the absence of any chest radiographic abnormality potentially related to infection (51). PS, including residual GGO, fibrous stripe shadow, tractive bronchiectasis, reticulation, and bronchovascular bundle distortion, were evaluated by two radiologists. During our recruitment process, we excluded participants with underlying chronic lung diseases and cancers. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (no. 2020/0004), and written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Total nucleic acid extraction from nasopharyngeal specimens was performed using the QIAamp RNA viral kit (Qiagen), and two sets of primers were taken for two target genes (i.e., open reading frame 1ab [ORF1ab] and nucleocapsid protein [N]). Detection of serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies was evaluated by IgM/IgG antibody detection kit (Abbott Laboratories, Inc.).

Multiparametric flow cytometric analysis.

Peripheral blood (200 μl) from convalescent patients with COVID-19 was added into a tube, and 2 ml of red cell lysis buffer was added and incubated for 10 min. After lysis, the sample was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Immune cells were surface stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies. The samples were incubated with antibodies for 15 min at 4°C. Cells were resuspended in PBS and washed at 400 × g for 6 min. The specimens were immediately evaluated by flow cytometry.

For cytotoxic molecule detection, we isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from heparinized blood by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). For surface staining, PBMCs were washed twice with PBS containing 1% FBS and stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies. Intracellular staining for granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin was performed after cell fixation and permeabilization (eBioscience), and then intracellular proteins were labeled with the corresponding antibodies conjugated with fluorescent molecules according to the manufacturer's instructions.

A list of the antibodies used is provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material, and the gating strategy is presented in Fig. S1. Flow cytometry was performed using a BD LSRFortessa X-20 (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed with FlowJo v10 software.

TABLE S1

List of antibodies. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.06 MB (58.4KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2021 Wu et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Cytokine production assays.

PBMCs were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, and cytokine production assays were performed after lymphocytes were stimulated with polymethyl acrylate (PMA; 50 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 μM) in the presence of GolgiStop. After 5 h at 37°C, the cells were stained with fluorochrome-associated antibodies specific for surface molecules; next, the cells underwent fixation and permeabilization for intracellular staining with antibodies specific for the following intracellular proteins: IL-2, IL-4, IL-17A, IFN-γ, and TNF-α.

Statistical analysis.

The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the distribution of variance. Continuous variables with normally and nonnormally distributed data were assessed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests or Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Fisher’s exact test was applied to examine categorical variables. Spearman’s rank coefficient was used to determine correlations between two variables. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictive factors of residual lesions. The final model was determined using stepwise logistic regression, with significance level for selection set at a P value of 0.05. The optimum cutoff values were defined based on their maximum Youden index (sensitivity, +1; specificity, −1). All tests were 2-sided, and significance levels were set to *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; and ns, not significant. All statistical data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 statistical software (Chicago, IL, USA), GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA), or R software version 4.0.2 (Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna, Austria).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all participating patients for their support and cooperation as well as our colleagues from Imaging Department of Union Hospital.

This work was supported by funds from the Key Special Project of Ministry of Science and Technology, China (no. 2020YFC0845700), Scientific Research Projects of Chinese Academy of Engineering (no. 2020-KYGG-01-07), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. 2020kfyXGYJ029).

Footnotes

Citation Wu J, Tang L, Ma Y, Li Y, Zhang D, Li Q, Mei H, Hu Y. 2021. Immunological profiling of COVID-19 patients with pulmonary sequelae. mBio 12:e01599-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01599-21.

Contributor Information

Heng Mei, Email: hmei@hust.edu.cn.

Yu Hu, Email: dr_huyu@126.com.

Jose Luis Villarreal-Camacho, Universidad Libre.

Avery August, Cornell University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wu Z, McGoogan JM. 2020. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xu J, Zhou M, Luo P, Yin Z, Wang S, Liao T, Yang F, Wang Z, Yang D, Peng Y, Geng W, Li Y, Zhang H, Yang J. 2021. Plasma metabolomic profiling of patients recovered from COVID-19 with pulmonary sequelae 3 months after discharge. Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azkur AK, Akdis M, Azkur D, Sokolowska M, van de Veen W, Bruggen MC, O'Mahony L, Gao Y, Nadeau K, Akdis CA. 2020. Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and mechanisms of immunopathological changes in COVID-19. Allergy 75:1564–1581. doi: 10.1111/all.14364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao Y, Kilian C, Turner J-E, Bosurgi L, Roedl K, Bartsch P, Gnirck A-C, Cortesi F, Schultheiß C, Hellmig M, Enk LUB, Hausmann F, Borchers A, Wong MN, Paust H-J, Siracusa F, Scheibel N, Herrmann M, Rosati E, Bacher P, Kylies D, Jarczak D, Lütgehetmann M, Pfefferle S, Steurer S, Zur-Wiesch JS, Puelles VG, Sperhake J-P, Addo MM, Lohse AW, Binder M, Huber S, Huber TB, Kluge S, Bonn S, Panzer U, Gagliani N, Krebs CF. 2021. Clonal expansion and activation of tissue-resident memory-like Th17 cells expressing GM-CSF in the lungs of patients with severe COVID-19. Sci Immunol 6:eabf6692. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abf6692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel CD, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Hale M, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Jr., Campbell DJ, Rawlings DJ, Pepper M. 2021. Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19. Cell 184:169–183. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jiang XL, Wang GL, Zhao XN, Yan FH, Yao L, Kou ZQ, Ji SX, Zhang XL, Li CB, Duan LJ, Li Y, Zhang YW, Duan Q, Wang TC, Li ET, Wei X, Wang QY, Wang XF, Sun WY, Gao YW, Kang DM, Zhang JY, Ma MJ. 2021. Lasting antibody and T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients three months after infection. Nat Commun 12:897. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21155-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sekine T, Perez-Potti A, Rivera-Ballesteros O, Stralin K, Gorin JB, Olsson A, Llewellyn-Lacey S, Kamal H, Bogdanovic G, Muschiol S, Wullimann DJ, Kammann T, Emgard J, Parrot T, Folkesson E, Karolinska C-SG, Rooyackers O, Eriksson LI, Henter JI, Sonnerborg A, Allander T, Albert J, Nielsen M, Klingstrom J, Gredmark-Russ S, Bjorkstrom NK, Sandberg JK, Price DA, Ljunggren HG, Aleman S, Buggert M, Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group . 2020. Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19. Cell 183:158–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, Rawlings SA, Sutherland A, Premkumar L, Jadi RS, Marrama D, de Silva AM, Frazier A, Carlin AF, Greenbaum JA, Peters B, Krammer F, Smith DM, Crotty S, Sette A. 2020. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell 181:1489–1501. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Le Bert N, Tan AT, Kunasegaran K, Tham CYL, Hafezi M, Chia A, Chng MHY, Lin M, Tan N, Linster M, Chia WN, Chen MI, Wang LF, Ooi EE, Kalimuddin S, Tambyah PA, Low JG, Tan YJ, Bertoletti A. 2020. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457–462. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2550-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ni L, Ye F, Cheng ML, Feng Y, Deng YQ, Zhao H, Wei P, Ge J, Gou M, Li X, Sun L, Cao T, Wang P, Zhou C, Zhang R, Liang P, Guo H, Wang X, Qin CF, Chen F, Dong C. 2020. Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Immunity 52:971–977. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peng Y, Mentzer AJ, Liu G, Yao X, Yin Z, Dong D, Dejnirattisai W, Rostron T, Supasa P, Liu C, Lopez-Camacho C, Slon-Campos J, Zhao Y, Stuart DI, Paesen GC, Grimes JM, Antson AA, Bayfield OW, Hawkins D, Ker DS, Wang B, Turtle L, Subramaniam K, Thomson P, Zhang P, Dold C, Ratcliff J, Simmonds P, de Silva T, Sopp P, Wellington D, Rajapaksa U, Chen YL, Salio M, Napolitani G, Paes W, Borrow P, Kessler BM, Fry JW, Schwabe NF, Semple MG, Baillie JK, Moore SC, Openshaw PJM, Ansari MA, Dunachie S, Barnes E, Frater J, Kerr G, Goulder P, Lockett T, et al. 2020. Broad and strong memory CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 in UK convalescent individuals following COVID-19. Nat Immunol 21:1336–1345. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0782-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Herold S, Becker C, Ridge KM, Budinger GR. 2015. Influenza virus-induced lung injury: pathogenesis and implications for treatment. Eur Respir J 45:1463–1478. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00186214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Melms JC, Biermann J, Huang H, Wang Y, Nair A, Tagore S, Katsyv I, Rendeiro AF, Amin AD, Schapiro D, Frangieh CJ, Luoma AM, Filliol A, Fang Y, Ravichandran H, Clausi MG, Alba GA, Rogava M, Chen SW, Ho P, Montoro DT, Kornberg AE, Han AS, Bakhoum MF, Anandasabapathy N, Suarez-Farinas M, Bakhoum SF, Bram Y, Borczuk A, Guo XV, Lefkowitch JH, Marboe C, Lagana SM, Del Portillo A, Zorn E, Markowitz GS, Schwabe RF, Schwartz RE, Elemento O, Saqi A, Hibshoosh H, Que J, Izar B. 2021. A molecular single-cell lung atlas of lethal COVID-19. Nature 595:114–119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03569-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Han X, Fan Y, Alwalid O, Li N, Jia X, Yuan M, Li Y, Cao Y, Gu J, Wu H, Shi H. 2021. Six-month follow-up chest CT findings after severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiology 299:E177–E186. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu D, Zhang W, Pan F, Li L, Yang L, Zheng D, Wang J, Liang B. 2020. The pulmonary sequalae in discharged patients with COVID-19: a short-term observational study. Respir Res 21:125. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01385-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS, China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19 . 2020. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pandit A, De Boer RJ. 2019. Stochastic inheritance of division and death times determines the size and phenotype of CD8(+) T cell families. Front Immunol 10:436. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hammer Q, Ruckert T, Romagnani C. 2018. Natural killer cell specificity for viral infections. Nat Immunol 19:800–808. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0163-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Godfrey DI, Stankovic S, Baxter AG. 2010. Raising the NKT cell family. Nat Immunol 11:197–206. doi: 10.1038/ni.1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yazdanifar M, Mashkour N, Bertaina A. 2020. Making a case for using gammadelta T cells against SARS-CoV-2. Crit Rev Microbiol 46:689–702. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1822279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fernandez IE, Greiffo FR, Frankenberger M, Bandres J, Heinzelmann K, Neurohr C, Hatz R, Hartl D, Behr J, Eickelberg O. 2016. Peripheral blood myeloid-derived suppressor cells reflect disease status in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 48:1171–1183. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01826-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lebrun A, Lo Re S, Chantry M, Izquierdo Carerra X, Uwambayinema F, Ricci D, Devosse R, Ibouraadaten S, Brombin L, Palmai-Pallag M, Yakoub Y, Pasparakis M, Lison D, Huaux F. 2017. CCR2(+) monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) inhibit collagen degradation and promote lung fibrosis by producing transforming growth factor-beta1. J Pathol 243:320–330. doi: 10.1002/path.4956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ichikawa T, Hirahara K, Kokubo K, Kiuchi M, Aoki A, Morimoto Y, Kumagai J, Onodera A, Mato N, Tumes DJ, Goto Y, Hagiwara K, Inagaki Y, Sparwasser T, Tobe K, Nakayama T. 2019. CD103(hi) Treg cells constrain lung fibrosis induced by CD103(lo) tissue-resident pathogenic CD4 T cells. Nat Immunol 20:1469–1480. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0494-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang M, Zhang S. 2020. T cells in fibrosis and fibrotic diseases. Front Immunol 11:1142. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cassetta L, Baekkevold ES, Brandau S, Bujko A, Cassatella MA, Dorhoi A, Krieg C, Lin A, Lore K, Marini O, Pollard JW, Roussel M, Scapini P, Umansky V, Adema GJ. 2019. Deciphering myeloid-derived suppressor cells: isolation and markers in humans, mice and non-human primates. Cancer Immunol Immunother 68:687–697. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02302-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krejcik J, Casneuf T, Nijhof IS, Verbist B, Bald J, Plesner T, Syed K, Liu K, van de Donk NW, Weiss BM, Ahmadi T, Lokhorst HM, Mutis T, Sasser AK. 2016. Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune regulatory cells, promotes T-cell expansion, and skews T-cell repertoire in multiple myeloma. Blood 128:384–394. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-12-687749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Silvin A, Chapuis N, Dunsmore G, Goubet AG, Dubuisson A, Derosa L, Almire C, Henon C, Kosmider O, Droin N, Rameau P, Catelain C, Alfaro A, Dussiau C, Friedrich C, Sourdeau E, Marin N, Szwebel TA, Cantin D, Mouthon L, Borderie D, Deloger M, Bredel D, Mouraud S, Drubay D, Andrieu M, Lhonneur AS, Saada V, Stoclin A, Willekens C, Pommeret F, Griscelli F, Ng LG, Zhang Z, Bost P, Amit I, Barlesi F, Marabelle A, Pene F, Gachot B, Andre F, Zitvogel L, Ginhoux F, Fontenay M, Solary E. 2020. Elevated calprotectin and abnormal myeloid cell subsets discriminate severe from mild COVID-19. Cell 182:1401–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ong EZ, Chan YFZ, Leong WY, Lee NMY, Kalimuddin S, Haja Mohideen SM, Chan KS, Tan AT, Bertoletti A, Ooi EE, Low JGH. 2020. A dynamic immune response shapes COVID-19 progression. Cell Host Microbe 27:879–882.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Diggins KE, Serti E, Muir V, Rosasco M, Lu T, Balmas E, Nepom G, Long SA, Linsley PS. 2021. Exhausted-like CD8+ T cell phenotypes linked to C-peptide preservation in alefacept-treated T1D subjects. JCI Insight 6:e142680. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.142680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu J, Li S, Liu J, Liang B, Wang X, Wang H, Li W, Tong Q, Yi J, Zhao L, Xiong L, Guo C, Tian J, Luo J, Yao J, Pang R, Shen H, Peng C, Liu T, Zhang Q, Wu J, Xu L, Lu S, Wang B, Weng Z, Han C, Zhu H, Zhou R, Zhou H, Chen X, Ye P, Zhu B, Wang L, Zhou W, He S, He Y, Jie S, Wei P, Zhang J, Lu Y, Wang W, Zhang L, Li L, Zhou F, Wang J, Dittmer U, Lu M, Hu Y, Yang D, Zheng X. 2020. Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte responses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. EBioMedicine 55:102763. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li S, Jiang L, Li X, Lin F, Wang Y, Li B, Jiang T, An W, Liu S, Liu H, Xu P, Zhao L, Zhang L, Mu J, Wang H, Kang J, Li Y, Huang L, Zhu C, Zhao S, Lu J, Ji J, Zhao J. 2020. Clinical and pathological investigation of patients with severe COVID-19. JCI Insight 5:e138070. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.138070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang F, Hou H, Luo Y, Tang G, Wu S, Huang M, Liu W, Zhu Y, Lin Q, Mao L, Fang M, Zhang H, Sun Z. 2020. The laboratory tests and host immunity of COVID-19 patients with different severity of illness. JCI Insight 5:e137799. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.137799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Odak I, Barros-Martins J, Bosnjak B, Stahl K, David S, Wiesner O, Busch M, Hoeper MM, Pink I, Welte T, Cornberg M, Stoll M, Goudeva L, Blasczyk R, Ganser A, Prinz I, Forster R, Koenecke C, Schultze-Florey CR. 2020. Reappearance of effector T cells is associated with recovery from COVID-19. EBioMedicine 57:102885. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zheng M, Gao Y, Wang G, Song G, Liu S, Sun D, Xu Y, Tian Z. 2020. Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol 17:533–535. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0402-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Oja AE, Saris A, Ghandour CA, Kragten NAM, Hogema BM, Nossent EJ, Heunks LMA, Cuvalay S, Slot E, Linty F, Swaneveld FH, Vrielink H, Vidarsson G, Rispens T, van der Schoot E, van Lier RAW, Ten Brinke A, Hombrink P. 2020. Divergent SARS-CoV-2-specific T- and B-cell responses in severe but not mild COVID-19 patients. Eur J Immunol 50:1998–2012. doi: 10.1002/eji.202048908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. 2020. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA 324:782–793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hao S, Lian J, Lu Y, Jia H, Hu J, Yu G, Wang X, Xu K, Ni Q, Li Y, Liu J, Zhao H, Zhang X, Yu L, Yu X, Xiang D, Chen Y, Zheng S, Qiu Y, Li L, Liang T, Yang Y, Sheng J. 2020. Decreased B cells on admission associated with prolonged viral RNA shedding from the respiratory tract in coronavirus disease 2019: a case-control study. J Infect Dis 222:367–371. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sun JC, Beilke JN, Lanier LL. 2009. Adaptive immune features of natural killer cells. Nature 457:557–561. doi: 10.1038/nature07665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang L, Richards A, Barrasa MI, Hughes SH, Young RA, Jaenisch R. 2021. Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2105968118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105968118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yoo JK, Kim TS, Hufford MM, Braciale TJ. 2013. Viral infection of the lung: host response and sequelae. J Allergy Clin Immunol 132:1263–1276; quiz 1277. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zheng Y, Liu X, Le W, Xie L, Li H, Wen W, Wang S, Ma S, Huang Z, Ye J, Shi W, Ye Y, Liu Z, Song M, Zhang W, Han JJ, Belmonte JCI, Xiao C, Qu J, Wang H, Liu GH, Su W. 2020. A human circulating immune cell landscape in aging and COVID-19. Protein Cell 11:740–770. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00762-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Westmeier J, Paniskaki K, Karakose Z, Werner T, Sutter K, Dolff S, Overbeck M, Limmer A, Liu J, Zheng X, Brenner T, Berger MM, Witzke O, Trilling M, Lu M, Yang D, Babel N, Westhoff T, Dittmer U, Zelinskyy G. 2020. Impaired cytotoxic CD8(+) T cell response in elderly COVID-19 patients. mBio 11:e2105968118. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02243-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Meckiff BJ, Ramirez-Suastegui C, Fajardo V, Chee SJ, Kusnadi A, Simon H, Eschweiler S, Grifoni A, Pelosi E, Weiskopf D, Sette A, Ay F, Seumois G, Ottensmeier CH, Vijayanand P. 2020. Imbalance of regulatory and cytotoxic SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4(+) T cells in COVID-19. Cell 183:1340–1353. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maucourant C, Filipovic I, Ponzetta A, Aleman S, Cornillet M, Hertwig L, Strunz B, Lentini A, Reinius B, Brownlie D, Cuapio A, Ask EH, Hull RM, Haroun-Izquierdo A, Schaffer M, Klingstrom J, Folkesson E, Buggert M, Sandberg JK, Eriksson LI, Rooyackers O, Ljunggren HG, Malmberg KJ, Michaelsson J, Marquardt N, Hammer Q, Stralin K, Bjorkstrom NK, Karolinska C-SG, Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group . 2020. Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity. Sci Immunol 5. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goplen NP, Wu Y, Son YM, Li C, Wang Z, Cheon IS, Jiang L, Zhu B, Ayasoufi K, Chini EN, Johnson AJ, Vassallo R, Limper AH, Zhang N, Sun J. 2020. Tissue-resident CD8(+) T cells drive age-associated chronic lung sequelae after viral pneumonia. Sci Immunol 5:eabc4557. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abc4557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stephen-Victor E, Das M, Karnam A, Pitard B, Gautier JF, Bayry J. 2020. Potential of regulatory T-cell-based therapies in the management of severe COVID-19. Eur Respir J 56:2002182. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02182-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Huang B, Liu R, Wang P, Yuan Z, Yang J, Xiong H, Zhang N, Huang Q, Fu X, Sun W, Li L. 2020. CD8(+)CD57(+) T cells exhibit distinct features in human non-small cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer 8:e000639. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chiang SC, Theorell J, Entesarian M, Meeths M, Mastafa M, Al-Herz W, Frisk P, Gilmour KC, Ifversen M, Langenskiold C, Machaczka M, Naqvi A, Payne J, Perez-Martinez A, Sabel M, Unal E, Unal S, Winiarski J, Nordenskjold M, Ljunggren HG, Henter JI, Bryceson YT. 2013. Comparison of primary human cytotoxic T-cell and natural killer cell responses reveal similar molecular requirements for lytic granule exocytosis but differences in cytokine production. Blood 121:1345–1356. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chattopadhyay PK, Betts MR, Price DA, Gostick E, Horton H, Roederer M, De Rosa SC. 2009. The cytolytic enzymes granyzme A, granzyme B, and perforin: expression patterns, cell distribution, and their relationship to cell maturity and bright CD57 expression. J Leukoc Biol 85:88–97. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0208107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barrow AD, Martin CJ, Colonna M. 2019. The natural cytotoxicity receptors in health and disease. Front Immunol 10:909. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bruns AH, Oosterheert JJ, El Moussaoui R, Opmeer BC, Hoepelman AI, Prins JM. 2010. Pneumonia recovery: discrepancies in perspectives of the radiologist, physician and patient. J Gen Intern Med 25:203–206. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1182-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Gating strategy. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.7 MB (693.4KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2021 Wu et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

List of antibodies. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.06 MB (58.4KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2021 Wu et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES