Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2021 Aug 5;24(10):1465–1474. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00901-w

Extended Data Fig. 1. Computational experiment setup for all candidate SOZ features and statistical analysis.

Extended Data Fig. 1

Computational experiment setup for all candidate SOZ features and statistical analysis - (a) Any candidate feature that can produce a spatiotemporal heatmap was computed from EEG data and then partitioned by the clinically annotated SOZ set and the complement, SOZC (i.e. non-SOZ electrodes) to compute a confidence statistic measuring the feature’s belief of the clinician’s hypothesis. Here FSOZ and FSOZC were the feature values within their respective sets. fθ is the function depending on the Random Forest model parameters, θ that maps the statistics of the FSOZ and FSOZC to a confidence statistic. An ideal feature would have high and low confidence for success and failed outcomes respectively. Each point on the final CS distribution comparisons represent one patient. (b) A more detailed schematic of how our proposed fragility and baseline features were computed from EEG data for a single snapshot of EEG data. See fragility methods section for description of x, A and Δ.