Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;12(10):6558–6570. doi: 10.1364/BOE.433281

Table 4. The performance comparison of different models for predicting pathologic grades. a .

Model Training cohort
Validation cohort
AUC (95%) SEN (95%) SPE (95%) AUC (95%) SEN (95%) SPE (95%)
Clinical 71.7 (66.5-76.5) 74.0 (68.2-79.1) 58.7 (45.6-71.0) 67.2 (60.5-73.4) 77.1 (70.2-83.0) 50.0 (32.9-67.1)
TCMF+TACS 85.9 (81.6-89.4) 88.7 (84.2-92.2) 68.3 (55.3-79.4) 86.3 (80.9-90.6) 83.8 (77.6-88.9) 77.8 (60.8-89.9)
combined model 87.4 (83.3-90.8) 85.3 (80.4-89.3) 76.2 (63.8-86.0) 87.4 (82.3-91.6) 84.4 (78.2-89.3) 75.0 (57.8-87.9)
a

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity.