Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;11:21126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00560-8

Table 4.

Sensitivity analysis of diagnostic accuracy of the saliva RT-LAMP test, as compared to several references.

Reference standard Total, n Positive samples, N Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 2 targets 1718 88 35% (26–45) 97% (96–98)
 Symptoms 691 47 34% (24–46) 96% (95–98)
 No symptoms 1027 41 36% (21–54) 97% (96–98)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 1 target and Ct value < 32 1718 88 37% (27–47) 97% (96–98)
 Symptoms 691 47 36% (24–49) 96% (94–98)
 No symptoms 1027 41 38% (22–56) 97% (96–98)
Saliva RT-PCR ≥ 1 target 1640 85 30% (23–38) 97% (96–98)
 Symptoms 662 45 28% (19–38) 96% (95–98)
 No symptoms 978 40 33% (22–47) 98% (97–99)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 1 target or Saliva RT-PCR ≥ 1 target 1648 87 28% (22–36) 97% (96–98)
 Symptoms 667 47 27% (19–37) 97% (95–98)
 No symptoms 981 40 30% (20–43 98% (97–99)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 1 target or Saliva RT-PCR ≥ 1 target and Ct value < 32 1646 87 34% (26–42) 97% (96–98)
 Symptoms 666 47 30% (21–41) 97% (95–98)
 No symptoms 980 40 40% (26–55) 98% (97–99)
NPS antigen 1474 79 37% (28–47) 97% (96–98)
 Symptoms 652 45 35% (24–46) 97% (95–98)
 No symptoms 822 34 44% (26–62) 97% (96–98)

95% CI 95% confidence interval.