Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 21;140(3):196–207. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012248

Table 1.

Randomized clinical trials of COVID-19 convalescent plasma

First author or trial name Country of origin Trial design CCParm, N Control arm, N Control Clinical status: severity of COVID-19 No. of days to enrollment from Primary end point Efficacy Comment
Symptom onset Admission
PLACID Trial19 India RCT open label 227 224 Standard of care Moderate WHO scale 4-5 Median of 4 d (IQR 6-11) Composite of progression Composite of progression to severe disease or all-cause mortality by d 28 10% CCP vs 18% control met primary endpoint (RR 1.04; 95% CI (0.71-1.54) CCP titer varied widely
AlQahtani20 Bahrain RCT open label 20 20 Standard of care Moderate WHO scale 4-6 Variable Variable Requirement for noninvasive or mechanical ventilation support 6 control and 4 CCP patients reached primary endpoint (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.22-2.0, P = .72) N/A
Avendano-Sola31 Spain RCT open label 38 43 Standard of care Moderate WHO scale 4-6 Median of 8 d (IQR, 6-9) N/A Proportion of patients on noninvasive ventilation or high-flow O2; or on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO or death by d 15 0% CCP vs 14% control advanced to mechanical ventilation; mortality rates were 0% CCP vs 9.3% control on d 15 and 29. Trial did not reach enrollment goal.
CONCOR-1 Study Group13 Canada and USA RCT open label 614 307 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-6 8 d (IQR 5-10) N/A Composite of intubation or death by d 30 Convalescent plasma did not reduce the risk of intubation or death at 30 d. Trial terminated at 78% enrollment after meeting stopping criteria for futility.
Bennet-Guerrerro21 USA RCT double-blind 59 15 Nonimmune plasma Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-7* N/A Total no. of ventilation-free days from randomization to d 28 CCP was not associated with improved outcome. Enrollment terminated early after emergency use authorization was granted for CCP.
REMAP-CAP Investigators26 Multinational RCT open label 1084 916 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-7* Median of 10 d (IQR 6-15) From hospital admission, 1.7-1.8; from ICU admission, 17.2-17.7 Organ support-free days to d 21 Endpoint reached for 0 (IQR –1 to 16) for control. Median adjusted OR 0.97 (95% credible interval 0.83-1.15). The prespecified criteria for futility were met thereby terminating the trial.
Gharbharan22 The Netherlands RCT open label 43 43 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-7* Median of 10 d (IQR 6-15) Median 2 d (IQR 1-3) Clinical status on 8-point WHO COVID-19 disease severity score on d 15 and 30 No overall clinical benefit of CCP was observed. CCP had no effect on disease course. CCP did not enhance viral clearance from respiratory tract. CCP did not influence SARS-COV-2 antibody development or serum proinflammatory cytokine levels. Found that vast majority of patients had neutralizing SARS-COV-2 antibodies at hospital admission. This finding led to early termination of trial.
RECOVERY Trial26 United Kingdom RCT open label 5795 5763 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-7* 9 d (6-12) 2 d (1-4) 28-d mortality No significant difference in primary endpoint in CCP (24%) vs control (24%) groups (rate ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.93-1.07; P = .95). The 28-d mortality rate ratio was similar in all prespecified subgroups of patients, including in-patients without detectable SARS-COV-2 antibodies at randomization.
Kirenga27 Uganda RCT open label 69 67 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-6 Median of 7 d (IQR 4-8) N/A Time to viral clearance Time to viral clearance was not different between the 2 arms. N/A
SIREN-C3PO Investigators35 USA RCT single blind 257 254 Normal saline Mild WHO scale 2-3 Median of 4 d. Mean of 3.7 ± 2.1 d N/A Disease progression within 15 d Disease progression occurred in 77/257 (30%) of CCP group vs 81/254 (31.9%) of placebo group (risk difference 1.9%; 95% credible interval, –6.0 to 9.8). Trial enrollment was halted after a planned interim analysis of the primary outcome indicated that the threshold for futility had been reached.
CAPSID Trial28 Germany RCT open label 53 52 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-7 Median of 7 d (IQR 4-10) N/A Dichotomous composite of survival and no longer fulfilling criteria for severe COVID-19 on d 21 The primary outcome occurred in 43.4% of patients in the CCP and 32.7% of patient in the control group (P = .32). Patients in the CCP arm received 3 units of high-titer CCP over a period of 5 d.
Li23 China RCT open label 52 51 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-7* Median of 30 d N/A Time to clinical improvement within 28 d 51% CCP vs 31% control met primary endpoint (HR 1.40; 95% CI 0.79-2.49; P = .26) 103 of planned 200 enrolled
Libster33 Argentina RCT double-blind 80 80 Normal saline Asymptomatic to mild WHO scale 1-2 <72 h N/A Severe respiratory disease 16% CCP vs 31% control met primary endpoint (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.94; P = .03) Trial did not reach enrollment goal.
O’Donnell24 USA and Brazil RCT double-blind 150 73 Nonimmune plasma Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-9 Control: 9 d (IQR 7-11) CCP: 10 d (IQR 7-13) N/A Clinical status at 28 d No significant improvement in CCP cohort (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.83-2.68; P = .18. 28-d mortality was significantly lower in CCP cohort vx control (19/150 [12.6%] vs 18/73 [24.6%], OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.91; P = .034).
Salman30 Egypt RCT open label 15 15 Standard of care Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-6 8 d CCP cohort; 9 d control group 13 d At least 50% improvement of the severity of illness at any time during 5 d after transfusion. In CCP group there was an improvement in 4 signs of symptoms of illness severity within 5-d study period that was significant compared with control group (P < .05). N/A
PlasmAr Study Group29 Argentina RCT double-blind 228 105 Normal Saline Moderate to severe WHO scale 4-6 8 d (IQR 5-10) N/A N/A Clinical status 30 d after intervention using WHO 6-point disease severity scale No significant difference reported between CCP and control cohort in the distribution of clinical outcomes (OR 0.83; 95%, CI 0.52-1.35; P = .46). N/A

Published RCTs were used that compared CCP with standard of care or placebo; preprints were included for trials with >80 subjects.

IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; N/A, not applicable.

*

Information was not available to distinguish between WHO scale categories 7 and 9.