Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 13;12:721588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.721588

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics.

Impaired Total words Cluster size Number switches Frequency Imageability Familiarity Length graphemes Orth similarity Phon similarity Concreteness Valence Arousal Age of acquisition
Animal 10/50 30 (10) 1.9 (0.5) 6.4 (2.7) 0.8 (0.1) 6.3 (0.1) 5.7 (0.1) 6.3 (0.3) 6.9 (1.6) 16.9 (3.5) 6.1 (0.1) 5.1 (0.8) 4.6 (1.2) 4.3 (0.3)
Letter 4/50 23 (7) 1.6 (1.2) 3.8 (2.5) 0.9 (0.3) 5.7 (0.4) 5.8 (0.2) 6.1 (0.7) 9.0 (3.3) 18.5 (6.5) 5.3 (0.3) 5.3 (0.8) 4.1 (0.7) 4.9 (0.7)
Unconstrained 9/50 45 (16) 2.3 (0.9) 9.5 (4.6) 1.4 (0.3) 6.0 (0.4) 6.1 (0.1) 6.6 (0.7) 7.1 (1.5) 16.3 (3.5) 5.6 (0.4) 5.3 (0.7) 4.6 (0.9) 4.3 (0.5)
All_tasks NA 98 (28) 2.1 (0.5) 19.6 (7.8) 1.1 (0.2) 6.0 (0.2) 5.9 (0.1) 6.4 (0.4) 7.4 (1.3) 16.9 (2.8) 5.7 (0.2) 5.2 (0.5) 4.4 (0.6) 4.4 (0.3)

Impaired,number of people with HIV (N=50) who produced significantly fewer words, relative to a normative sample (Ferreres et al., 2007). NA,number not available because the normative sample (Ferreres et al., 2007) does not consider values for the three tasks together or values for each person included in the standardization.