Table 3.
Author(s), year | Aim | ka | Sample size | Measuring instrument | Effect size | I2 | kadj | ||
|
|
|
|
|
Effect size | 95% CI (LLb to ULc) | P value |
|
|
Iruthayarajah et al, 2017 [24] | To evaluate the effectiveness of VRd interventions in improving balance in a chronic stroke population | 13 | EGe: 145; CGf: 166 | TUGg | 0.367 | 0.134 to 0.601 | .002 | 0 | 5.467 |
Liang et al, 2020 [26] | To evaluate the effectiveness of VR technology in promoting balance and walking function rehabilitation in stroke | 18 | EG: 271; CG: 271 | TUG | –2.79 | –4.88 to –0.69 | .009 | 86.2 | 12.267 |
ak: number of primary studies.
bLL: lower limit.
cUL: upper limit.
dVR: virtual reality.
eEG: experimental group.
fCG: control group.
gTUG: Timed Up and Go.