Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 May 11;45(6):1304–1316. doi: 10.1111/acer.14620

TABLE 1.

Sample characteristics as a function of drinking status at 1-year after initial resolution

Variable Drinking Status at 1-year after Initial Resolution
Resolved Abstinent
(n = 273)
Unstable
Resolution (n = 140)
Resolved
Nonabstinent (n = 80)
Test statistic
Demographic characteristics
 Male, n (%) 181 (66.79) 93 (66.91) 57 (71.25) χ2 (2) = 0.60
 Female, n (%) 90 (33.21) 46 (33.09) 23 (28.75)
 White, n (%) 178 (65.93) 86 (62.32) 57 (71.25) χ2 (2) = 11.28***
 Other race/ethnicity, n (%) 92 (34.07) 52 (37.68) 23 (28.75)
 Married, n (%) 107 (40.07) 47 (34.56) 41 (51.25) χ2 (2) = 5.85
 Not Married, n (%) 160 (59.93) 89 (65.44) 39 (48.75)
 Employed full/part time, n (%) 121 (45.32) 63 (46.32) 42 (52.50) χ2 (2) = 1.29
 Unemployed, n (%) 146 (54.68) 73 (53.68) 38 (47.50)
 Age (years) 46.49 (10.75)a 47.19 (11.87)a 51.18 (14.09)b F(2, 487) = 5.03***
 Education (years) 13.82 (2.75)a 14.37 (2.96)ab 14.76 (2.31)b F(2, 479) = 4.29**
Drinking problem history
 Help-seeking history (AA or treatment), n (%) 49 (40.83) 22 (40.74) 4 (13.79) χ2(2) = 7.79**
 Drinking problem duration (years) 17.09 (10.88) 17.64 (11.45) 16.11 (12.21) F(2, 473) = 0.46
 Alcohol Dependence Scale (47) 21.64 (9.58)a 18.52 (8.62)b 16.49 (8.50)b F(2, 479) = 11.91***
 Drinking Problems Scale (40) 18.25 (8.90)a 16.44 (8.66)ab 13.79 (8.30)b F(2, 486) = 8.49***
Preresolution year drinking practices (TLFB)
 Number of heavy drinking days (0– 365) 246.67 (124.63)a 197.76 (120.27)b 210.94 (144.99)a F(2, 486) = 7.55***
 Mean quantity per drinking day (ml ethanol) 229.34 (196.93)a 172.49 (120.71)b 137.36 (90.37)b F(2, 487) = 12.07***
Preresolution year monetary allocation ($)
 Total income 53,559 (70,612) 62,657 (87,736) 66,535 (66,810) F(2, 485) = 1.24
 Total expenditures 52,628 (56,683) 55,970 (61,677) 68,326 (52,228) F(2, 484) = 2.28
 Discretionary expenditures (DE) 15,953 (15,229) 16,468 (14,959) 17,023 (12,447) F(2, 484) = 0.18
 Expenditures on alcohol 3758 (3812)a 3055 (2763)a 2690 (3026)b F(2, 485) = 3.90*
 Money saved 1664 (5466) 1225 (4400) 1784 (4670) F(2, 485) = 0.44
 Alcohol/Savings DE index 0.24 (0.28)a 0.21 (0.29)a 0.14 (0.31)b F(2, 484) = 3.59*
Postresolution year drinking practices (TLFB)
 Number of heavy drinking days (0– 365) 0.01 (0.10)a 35.66 (56.70)b 3.41 (25.61)a F(2, 487) = 59.86***
 Mean quantity per drinking day (ml ethanol) 4.14 (33.67)a 113.87 (90.62)b 38.49 (23.81)c F(2, 487) = 181.59***
Postresolution year monetary allocation ($)
 Total income 51,829 (75,832) 58,168 (98,713) 70,737 (93,842) F(2, 486) = 1.53
 Total expenditures 49,594 (67,242) 51,274 (67,553) 63,093 (69,828) F(2, 486) = 1.25
 Discretionary expenditures 11,591 (11,820)a 14,799 (22,142)a 14,363 (18,647)a F(2, 486) = 2.08
 Expenditures on alcohol 72 (247)a 561 (858)b 299 (644)c F(2, 487) = 35.84***
 Money saved 1854 (5287) 2390 (12,710) 2655 (10,965) F(2, 486) = 0.35
 Alcohol/Savings DE index −0.09 (0.18)a 0.02 (0.19)b −0.05 (0.16)a F(2, 486) = 16.11***

Note: Table shows means (standard deviations) for continuous variables and frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables for participants with 1-year outcome data (N = 493). Percentages reflect nonmissing cases in each categorical variable. Possible score ranges for scaled questionnaires are given in parentheses after the variable name. Higher Drinking Problems Scale scores indicate greater alcohol-related problems; higher Alcohol Dependence Scale scores indicate greater alcohol dependence levels. ASDE values could range from 1.0 to – 1.0 [1.0 = all discretionary expenditures (DE) for alcoholic beverages; – 1.0 = all DE were for saving money; 0 = equal proportions of DE for alcohol and savings). TLFB =Timeline Followback interview. Heavy drinking days: >4 drinks for women and >5 drinks for men. Monetary variables were inflation-adjusted based on national data on personal consumption expenditures provided by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=19&step=2#reqid=19&step=2&isuri=1&1921=underlying). Means and frequencies with different superscripts were significantly different in pairwise comparisons.

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p < 0.00.