. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jan 5;54(4):595–605. doi: 10.1002/eat.23466

Table 4.

Odds ratio and 99% confidence interval of eating disorder risk by weight-related self-monitoring (WRSM) pattern among women^†

	EDE-Q ≥ 4^‡	Fasted	Compensatory Behavior	Binge Eating

“No WRSM”	Ref^a	Ref^a	Ref^a	Ref^a
“All WRSM”	13.64 (8.53, 21.83)^b	4.19 (3.20, 5.48)^b	5.00 (3.90, 6.42)^b	2.99 (2.34, 3.83)^b
“Know Nutrition/Calorie Facts”	5.40 (3.45, 8.44)^c	1.91 (1.52, 2.41)^c	2.39 (1.96, 2.90)^c	1.83 (1.52, 2.22)^c
“Self-Weigh Only”	4.36 (2.43, 7.81)^c	2.32 (1.71, 3.14)^c	2.05 (1.56, 2.69)^c	1.80 (1.38, 2.34)^c

^†

Superscripts are the result of pairwise comparisons of within column; differing superscript letters represent statistically significant differences between the probability estimates at p<.01. Models included age, BMI, parent education, and race/ethnicity as covariates.

^‡

EDE-Q = Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (C.G. Fairburn & Beglin, 2008).